Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

མཆག་ཏ་གདགས་པའ་མད notes: Notes

The Sūtra “Declaring What Is Supreme” notes

Language
English

Notes

notes.1

1. The Pali canon emerged in written form around the first century bce. The oldest Chinese parallel for this text is included in the Ekottarikāgama (Taishō 125). It was translated into Chinese in 384 ce.

notes.2

2. For online links to all three Pali texts along with English translations, see the Bibliography.

notes.3

3. British Library, Hoernle 149.140.

notes.4

4. Bibliothèque Nationale de France, Pelliot Sanskrit: petit fragment 83. Pauly (1960, pp. 519–24) provides a transcription of the fragment and reproduces a passage from Speyer’s edition of the Avadānaśataka, which is supplemented with notes detailing variant readings of the fragment.

notes.5

5. Oriental Department of the State Library at Berlin, SHT 24f. See Waldschmidt (1965), pp. 16–17, n. 24.

notes.6

6. Türkische Turfan-Text VIII H. See von Gabain (1954), pp. 54–56.

notes.7

7. In the ninth story, there is no setting or conclusion given for The Sūtra “Declaring What Is Supreme,” although it is referred to as a sūtra: bhagavān idaṃ sūtraṃ bhāṣate sma. In that version, the Buddha preaches the sūtra to brahmins and householders. See Speyer (1902–6), pp. 49–50. In the fifty-seventh story, only the setting is omitted, and the Buddha preaches it to monks, as found here in The Sūtra “Declaring What Is Supreme.” See Speyer (1902–6), pp. 329–30.

notes.8

8. For a Sanskrit edition, see Vaidya (1959), p. 95, and for an English translation, see Rotman (2008), p. 268.

notes.9

9. The version that appears in the Great Upholder of the Secret Mantra, one of the Pañcarakṣā, suggests the teaching was considered to have a protective function. This would be in line with the Pañcarakṣā being seen as protective texts (Hartmann and Maue 1996, p. 149, n. 9).

notes.10

10. Ekottarikāgama 21.1 (di yi de 第一徳). An English translation of this text from Chinese by Thích Huyên-Vi, Sara Boin-Webb, and Bhikkhu Pāsādika is available at SuttaCentral with the title Highest Faith .

notes.11

11. See Bhikkhu Anālayo (2016), p. 1.

notes.12

12. See Bingenheimer (2011), p. 1.

notes.13

13. For further information, see Resources for Kanjur and Tenjur Studies at Universität Wein (last accessed 30 May 2023).

notes.14

14. Although the colophon is fragmentary, it begins as follows: agra­prajñapti­sūtrasyopadeśaḥ…, “instructions on The Sūtra “Declaring What Is Supreme”…” See Waldschmidt (1965), p. 16.

notes.15

15. Speyer (1902–6) edited the Sanskrit text of the Avadānaśataka based on four different Nepalese manuscripts. Manuscript B in Nepalese script, dated to 1645, is the common source for the other three. Vaidya (1958) published another edition based on Speyer’s.

notes.16

16. Feer’s translation (1891) predates Speyer’s edition and is based on a single Nepalese manuscript.

notes.17

17. Naomi Appleton (2020) translates the first four sections of the Avadānaśataka.

notes.18

18. The version that is found in the Avadānaśataka (Avś), and in its Tibetan translation (Toh 343) begins with this sentence.

notes.19

19. Reading with KY, K, C, U and H: dge slong dag ’di gsum ni mchog tu gdags pa yin te, and Avś tisra imā bhikṣavo ’graprajñaptayaḥ. D here has the corrupt reading na in place of ni.

notes.20

20. The phrase “in this regard” (Tib. de la) is absent in Avś and in Toh 343.

notes.21

21. The words “with four legs” are absent in Avś, though present in Frgm and in Toh 343.

notes.22

22. This refers to the category of beings abiding in the fourth and highest level of the formless realm. These are either the gods that abide there or persons who have reached this state through meditative equipoise. This state is also referred to as the “peak of existence” (Skt. bhavāgra; Tib. srid rtse) and is situated at the apex of saṃsāra. The beings there do not experience perceptions and yet cannot be said to be without perceptions.

notes.23

23. The phrase “the arhat, the completely perfect Buddha” is absent in Frgm.

notes.24

24. Frgm reads instead iyaṃ prathamā agraprajñaptiḥ, “This is the first declaration as supreme.”

notes.25

25. Alternatively, this may be rendered “dispassion (i.e., being free of attachment) is the supreme Dharma.”

notes.26

26. The phrase “the arhat, the completely perfect Buddha” is absent in Avś and its Tibetan translation (Toh 343).