[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Buddhist Sanskrit literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit) › [Āgama sūtras of the mainstream schools](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama) › [Sūtras of the Connected Discourses transmitted singly](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta) › [Nandikasūtra](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra) › [འཕགས་པ་དགའ་བ་ཅན་གྱི་མདོ](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo) › The Sūtra of Nandika # The Sūtra of Nandika Translation of [འཕགས་པ་དགའ་བ་ཅན་གྱ་མད (འཕགས་པ་དགའ་བ་ཅན་གྱི་མདོ)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo) - **Language:** English - **Translator:** [Giuliano Proença](https://indike.org/pramana/person/giuliano-proenca) - **Extent:** 101 passages, 5,058 words - **Text:** complete digital text - **Source:** 84000 · Published by 84000 (v 1.0.1 2024). 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha,… · CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha). Shown whole and unaltered, with its notes, on a… ## Contents - [intro 84000's introduction](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.intro) — 9 parts - [1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.1) - [2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.2) - [3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.3) - [4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.4) - [5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.5) - [6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.6) - [7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.7) - [notes Notes](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes) — 85 parts ## Text ### 84000's introduction ### [intro.1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.intro.1) While staying at the Vulture Peak Mountain in Rājagṛha, the Buddha describes the negative consequences of breaking the five basic precepts to the layman Nandika and five hundred other lay practitioners. This sūtra is often mentioned and quoted in traditional Buddhist works, mostly concerning the consequences of inebriation by alcohol. ### [intro.2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.intro.2) The Sūtra of Nandika consists of a teaching on the negative consequences of breaking the five basic precepts, as taught by the Buddha to the layman Nandika and five hundred other lay practitioners at the Vulture Peak Mountain in Rājagṛha. Ten negative consequences are described as the result of violating each of the first four basic precepts, which relate to killing, stealing, sexual misconduct, and lying. For the last precept, concerning intoxicating drinks, the text lists thirty-five negative consequences. This scripture is often mentioned and quoted in traditional Buddhist works, mostly concerning the consequences of inebriation by alcohol, on which it is a noted authority. ### [intro.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.intro.3) For a long time, the Sanskrit text of the Nandikasūtra was thought to be lost. However, two complete Sanskrit manuscripts of the sūtra in the dhārikā script were found in the Potala Palace archives in Lhasa. An edition of these, along with parallel Tibetan text and English translation, was published in 2010 by Bhikṣuṇī Vinītā.¹ As surmised by Jonathan Silk,² these Potala manuscripts may date to the thirteenth century. One of the manuscripts is part of a collection of twenty sūtras which have moral discipline and karmic cause and effect as their recurrent themes. This manuscript, called “Ms” by Vinītā (our Skt1), is often closer to the Tibetan translation than the independent manuscript called “S2” by Vinītā (our Skt2), which is somewhat longer.³ Another extant manuscript is a Sanskrit birch bark fragment of The Sūtra of Nandika found among the Gilgit Manuscripts, which comprises only the last part of the sūtra. The script used is the Proto-Śāradā (seventh century onwards), which was normally used for non-Mahāyāna texts. It is believed that the Gilgit manuscripts were written during the Palola Ṣāhi Dynasty (sixth to eighth centuries).⁴ ### [intro.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.intro.4) The Chinese Dazhidu lun, a translation of the Treatise on the Long Perfection of Wisdom attributed to Nāgārjuna and translated into Chinese between 402–406 ce, is the earliest datable textual reference to The Sūtra of Nandika, from which it quotes extensively.⁵ Many other Indian works refer to the Nandikasūtra concerning the negative effects of alcohol abuse. Noriyuki Kudo presents three Sanskrit references to The Sūtra of Nandika in the Mahākarma­vibhaṅga and one in the Abhi­dharma­kośavyākhyā by Yaśomitra (around the late sixth century ce).⁶ In Tibetan translation, it is also mentioned by Ajitamitra (ninth–tenth century ce) in his Ratnāvalīṭīkā ⁷ (Toh 4159), and in Sajjana’s Putralekha (Toh 4187), dated to the second half of the eleventh century.⁸ Related lists of the consequences of breaking the five precepts are also included in two sūtras found in Tibetan translation in the Kangyur, namely The Exposition of Karma (Karmavibhaṅga, Toh 338),⁹ and Transformation of Karma (Karmavibhaṅga, Toh 339). ¹⁰ However, the lists presented in those texts do not always precisely match those found in The Sūtra of Nandika. ### [intro.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.intro.5) The Tibetan translation of The Sūtra of Nandika is included in most Kangyur collections¹¹ and one folio containing the first two pages of The Sūtra of Nandika is among the Tibetan manuscripts found in the cave library at Dunhuang.¹² All Tibetan versions have the title ’phags pa dga’ ba can gyi mdo, except for the Dunhuang fragment, which reads dga’ bo’i mdo.¹³ The Tibetan translations present the standard Sanskrit title Āryanandika­sūtra, while the two extant Sanskrit manuscripts have Āryanandika­pari­pṛcchā­sūtra (Skt1) and Nandika­pari­pṛcchā­sūtra (Skt2). The colophons from the Degé, Lhasa, and the independent Kangyurs such as Phukdrak, among others, mention the Indian paṇḍita Śākyasiṃha and the Tibetan translator Jingyi Nyingpo as its translators, and Devacandra as the editor.¹⁴ ### [intro.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.intro.6) The Sūtra of Nandika is listed in both of the extant imperial catalogs of translated texts: the Phangthangma and the Denkarma, the latter of which lists it under “Hīnayāna” (Tib. theg pa chung ngu) texts.¹⁵ The period in which these translators worked and the inclusion of the text in these catalogs indicates clearly that the translation was made sometime during the late eighth to early ninth century, most likely from Sanskrit, since an Indian paṇḍita was involved. Although no Tibetan masters appear to have written commentaries on The Sūtra of Nandika, they have often quoted it when teaching on the negative consequences of consuming alcohol or sexual misconduct.¹⁶ ### [intro.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.intro.7) The Chinese translation of the Nandikasūtra, The Sūtra on the Conditions for Renouncing Secular Life (Taishō no. 791),¹⁷ was identified by Yukihiro Okada in 1986.¹⁸ This translation was attributed to An Shigao (fl. 148–80 ce), but Okada argues that the actual translator is unknown. This opinion is shared by Kudo (2002).¹⁹ Okada states that one cannot determine the date of the translation for certain, but that it seems to date from the old period of translation from Indic languages into Chinese—in other words, the period of translations starting with Kumārajīva (344–413 ce) and ending before Xuanzang (c. 602–64 ce).²⁰ In Taishō 791, the lists of the negative consequences of breaking the five precepts are very close to those found in The Sūtra of Nandika. However, the Tibetan version appears to have been made from a different and somewhat longer Sanskrit recension, since part of the introductory section and the verses at the end are absent from the Chinese. Notably, the same sections are also missing from the Sanskrit manuscripts and the Dunhuang fragment. ### [intro.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.intro.8) The first complete modern, Western translation of The Sūtra of Nandika was published by Léon Feer, in French, in his Extraits du Kandjour,²¹ together with a short introduction on the five basic precepts.²² A more recent English translation was published by Bhikṣuṇī Vinītā in 2010, based on the Sanskrit manuscripts from the Potala.²³ This translation has proved very useful in preparing our own translation.²⁴ ### [intro.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.intro.9) This translation is based on the Degé edition of Toh 334, while also consulting the variants listed in the Comparative Edition (dpe bsdur ma) of the Kangyur, as well as the Stok Palace, Phukdrak, and Hemis I manuscripts. The Dunhuang fragment and the available Sanskrit materials have also been closely consulted. Any substantial variant readings are recorded in the notes. We also occasionally refer to the Chinese parallel and some parallel passages in other related texts. Bhikṣuṇī Vinītā’s translation and Jonathan Silk’s review of her edition were a particularly valuable resource. For example, in the numerical parsing of the lists of negative consequences, which is not always clear in the Tibetan, we have opted to follow the numbering suggested by Bhikṣuṇī Vinītā, which is based on the Sanskrit texts. ### [1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.1) Homage to the Three Jewels.²⁵ Thus did I hear at one time. The Bhagavān was dwelling at the Vulture Peak Mountain in Rājagṛha, together with a large saṅgha of one thousand two hundred and fifty monks who surrounded and honored him as he taught the Dharma.²⁶ He expounded that which is good in the beginning, good in the middle, good in the end, excellent in meaning, excellent in words, unique, perfect, completely pure, thoroughly refined, and concerns pure conduct.²⁷ At that time, the layman Nandika and a retinue of five hundred lay practitioners²⁸ departed from the great²⁹ city of Rājagṛha, and went to where the Bhagavān was. ### [2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.2) He bowed his head to the Bhagavān’s feet, circumambulated the Bhagavān three times, and sat down to one side.³⁰ Then, those five hundred lay practitioners also bowed their heads³¹ to the Bhagavān’s feet and sat down to one side.³² Then the layman Nandika asked the Bhagavān, “What sort of ripening will arise for those who violate the five basic precepts of a lay practitioner as prescribed by the bhagavān, the tathāgata, the arhat, the perfectly awakened Buddha who knows and sees?” The Bhagavān answered the layman Nandika, “Nandika, it is excellent that you have thought to ask the Tathāgata about this matter. Your intellect is vast, your consideration is fine, and your eloquence is excellent.³³ Therefore, Nandika, I shall teach the Dharma discourse called The Ten Negative Consequences. Listen well and duly and take it to heart! I shall explain it to you.”³⁴ “Excellent, Bhagavān,” said the layman Nandika, and he listened to the Bhagavān. The Bhagavān said, “Nandika, these ten negative consequences of killing should be known. What are the ten? They are as follows: (1) in this life one will beget hostility and also in other lives one will continue to experience hostility; (2) one will not be trusted by many beings;³⁵ (3) one will have nightmares; (4) one will experience fear and others will be fearful of you;³⁶ (5) even after going to sleep comfortably, one will wake up in distress;³⁷ (6) one will think of evil things; (7) one will be confused at the time of death;³⁸ (8) since one will commit and accumulate deeds leading to a short life, (9) after the dissolution of the body and death, one will fall into the lower realms, the bad destinations, and be reborn in the hells;³⁹ (10) even if, after dying and transmigrating from there, one is born in this world as a human, no matter where one is born, one will have a short life and also many illnesses. ### [3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.3) Nandika, these ten negative consequences of killing should be known. “Nandika, these ten negative consequences of taking what is not given should be known. What are the ten?⁴⁰ (1) One will incur great hostility; (2) one will be highly anxious;⁴¹ (3) one will act at the wrong time, one will act late in the day;⁴² (4) one will be surrounded⁴³ by non-virtuous friends; (5) one will be abandoned by virtuous friends; (6) one will have faulty discipline; (7) one will be troubled by kings,⁴⁴ by thieves,⁴⁵ and by punishments;⁴⁶ (8) since one will commit and accumulate deeds leading to the loss of wealth, (9) after the dissolution of the body and death, one will fall into the lower realms, the bad destinations, and be reborn in the hells; (10) even if, after dying and transmigrating from there, one is born in this world as a human, no matter where one is born, one will be poor.⁴⁷ The wealth one has obtained, acquired with great effort,⁴⁸ by the sweat of one’s brow, through the strength of one’s arms and legs, will be threatened by the five troubles. What are the five? One’s property⁴⁹ will be laid waste by kings, fire, water, disgruntled heirs, and secrets.⁵⁰ Nandika, these ten negative consequences of taking what is not given should be known. “Nandika, these ten negative consequences of sexual misconduct should be known. What are the ten? ### [4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.4) (1) One will experience the hostility of those whose spouses one has led astray;⁵¹ (2) one will quarrel with one’s spouse; (3) one’s non-virtuous qualities will increase and one’s virtuous qualities will decrease; (4) one will have no peace;⁵² (5) one’s son and wife will be unprotected;⁵³ (6) one’s wealth will be unguarded and unprotected, one’s house will be unguarded and unprotected, and one’s life will be unguarded and unprotected;⁵⁴ (7) one will not be trusted by one’s friends, relatives, kinsmen, and ministers;⁵⁵ (8) since one will commit and accumulate deeds leading to rivalry,⁵⁶ (9) after the dissolution of the body and death, one will fall into the lower realms, the bad destinations, and be reborn in the hells; (10) even if, after dying and transmigrating from there, one is born in this world as a human and becomes a woman, she will have a husband who has rival women, and if one becomes a man, he will not be able to protect his son and wife. Nandika, these ten negative consequences of sexual misconduct should be known. “Nandika, these ten negative consequences of telling lies should be known. What are the ten? (1) One’s mouth will be foul-smelling; (2) one will be abandoned by the protective⁵⁷ deities of the body and will become vulnerable to non-humans; (3) even when one speaks the truth, one’s words will be distrusted; (4) even when one’s assistance is needed, the learned will not think of asking; (5) untrue calumnies about oneself will spread; (6) one will be unworthy of respect;⁵⁸ (7) one will experience suffering and sadness;⁵⁹ (8) since one will commit and accumulate deeds leading to many false accusations, (9) after the dissolution of the body and death, one will fall into the lower realms, the bad destinations, and be reborn in the hells; (10) even if, after transmigrating from there, ### [5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.5) one is born in this world as a human, no matter where one is born, one will face many false accusations.⁶⁰ Nandika, these ten negative consequences of telling lies should be known. “Nandika, these thirty-five⁶¹ negative consequences of drinking spirituous liquors and intoxicants,⁶² which are the cause of heedlessness, should be known. What are these thirty-five? (1) In this life one’s wealth will be depleted; (2) illnesses will increase;⁶³ (3) quarrels and disputes will arise;⁶⁴ (4) one will pay attention to that which is meaningless;⁶⁵ (5) bad reputation will arise; (6) wisdom will weaken; (7) wealth will not be obtained,⁶⁶ and whatever wealth has already been obtained will diminish and come to an end; (8) one will be unable to keep secrets;⁶⁷ (9) one’s efficiency will wane; (10) one’s strength will be diminished; (11) one will neglect one’s mother; (12) one will neglect one’s father; (13) one will neglect śramaṇas; (14) one will neglect brahmins;⁶⁸ (15) one will not honor the head of the family; (16) one will disrespect the Buddha; (17) one will disrespect the Dharma; (18) one will disrespect the Saṅgha; (19) one will disrespect engagement in the trainings and have faulty discipline;⁶⁹ (20) the sense doors will be unguarded;⁷⁰ (21) one will become extremely heedless toward women; (22) one will be rejected by relatives, kinsmen, friends, and ministers; (23) one will be considered unattractive by many people;⁷¹ (24) one will become unpleasant to many people; (25) one’s actions will be at odds with Dharma; (26) one will uphold that which is not Dharma;⁷² (27) one will abandon the true Dharma; (28) one will abandon modesty and decency;⁷³ ### [6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.6) (29) even when enemies are present, the learned will not think of asking one for assistance;⁷⁴ (30) one will act heedlessly and with negligence;⁷⁵ (31) one will not abide by the teaching of the Tathāgata;⁷⁶ (32) one will be far from nirvāṇa; (33) since one will commit and accumulate deeds leading to insanity, (34) after the dissolution of the body and death, one will fall into the lower realms, the bad destinations, and be reborn in the hells; (35) even if, after dying and transmigrating from there, one is born in this world as a human, no matter where one is born, one will be mad and have a blurry memory. Nandika, these thirty-five negative consequences of spirituous liquors and intoxicants, which are the cause of heedlessness, should be known.” Thus spoke the Bhagavān. After the Sugata had spoken thus, the Teacher added: “Being beneficial and compassionate to sentient beings, One must abandon⁷⁷ killing, beating, and binding. In the same way that you protect your own beloved⁷⁸ life, Protect the lives of others too! “Others have accumulated their wealth with great difficulty, So one should not even think about that which is not given. Having experienced separation from what one loves in the world, Just so, one should be steady for the benefit of others.⁷⁹ “One should avoid others’ adorned spouses Like a burning flame.⁸⁰ One should be content with the spouse one has found,⁸¹ And not engage, out of lust, in that which is like poison. “One should not knowingly speak falsehood, Neither for the sake of oneself nor for the sake of others. Neither hurting nor troubling others, And having pondered, one should speak with gentle words. “A person who is fond of drinking alcohol cannot bring about their own benefit or others’ happiness. Spirits cause bewilderment and a bad complexion— One should not drink that which is like ### [7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.7) halāhala poison. “If one wishes to enter the higher realms as easily as entering a house, One must not kill living beings, nor steal the property of others, Nor tell lies, nor drink alcohol, Nor seek, even in thought, the spouse of another.⁸² “These are the precepts of householders Who wear white clothes and dwell at home. Beyond this, there is the teaching about the basic precepts, Taught by the Victorious One for renunciates.”⁸³ The layman Nandika, having heard this teaching in the presence of the Bhagavān, was pleased, delighted, overjoyed, glad, full of happiness and cheerfulness of mind.⁸⁴ He rose from his seat, bowed his head to the Bhagavān’s feet, and circumambulated the Bhagavān three times. Delighted, he rejoiced at what the Bhagavān had said and departed. When the Bhagavān had spoken thus, the monks rejoiced and praised his words.⁸⁵ Colophon Translated by the Indian preceptor Śākyasiṃha and the translator Bandé Jingyi Nyingpo, and edited and finalized by the chief editor and translator Bandé Devacandra. ### Notes ### [notes.1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.1) 1. See Vinītā 2010, pp. 97–141. ### [notes.2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.2) 2. Silk 2013, pp. 62–63, n. 3. ### [notes.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.3) 3. In our translation we have followed the Tibetan text, which mostly corresponds to Skt1. In those instances where the Tibetan text accords more closely with Skt2, this has been recorded in the notes. ### [notes.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.4) 4. Kudo (2014, pp. 491–92) transliterates this fragment, which seems to be closer to Skt2. ### [notes.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.5) 5. Da zhi du lun 大智度論, Taishō no. 1509. For an English translation of these quotations see Lamotte 2001, pp. 622–23, 627, 630–31, 639–40, and 641–42. ### [notes.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.6) 6. Kudo 2014. ### [notes.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.7) 7. sdig pa dag las rnam par bzlog pa’i phyir te/ dper na dga’ byed la sogs pa’i mdo las ’byung ba lta bu’o. Note that dga’ byed is an alternative Tibetan translation of nandika. ### [notes.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.8) 8. Snellgrove 1985, p.109. ### [notes.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.9) 9. The Exposition of Karma (Karmavibhaṅga, Toh 338). ### [notes.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.10) 10. Transformation of Karma (Karmavibhaṅga, Toh 339). ### [notes.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.11) 11. This text is contained in the witnesses of the Tshalpa and Thempangma lines, in the Lhasa and Narthang Kangyurs (mixed line), Hemis I, and in some “independent” collections, such as Phukdrak, Dolpo, Lang mdo and Namgyal. See Resources for Kanjur & Tanjur Studies . Universität Wien. \[Last Accessed May 23, 2022\]. ### [notes.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.12) 12. IOL Tib J 91. ### [notes.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.13) 13. The Tibetan Karmavibhaṅga (Toh 338, ) also refers to The Sūtra of Nandika as dga’ bo’i mdo. ### [notes.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.14) 14. This information is absent in Peking, Lithang, Yongle, Kangxi, Narthang, Choné, Stok, and Shey. ### [notes.15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.15) 15. Denkarma, folio 301.a; Herrmann-Pfandt 2008, pp. 157–8. The Phangthangma lists it in the section on “short sutras” (mdo phra mo rnams); Phangthangma, p. 21. ### [notes.16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.16) 16. For examples, see Tsültrim Rinchen’s gsung ’bum (tshul khrims rin chen, 1697–1774, editor of the Degé Tengyur) and Chökyi Drakpa’s dgongs gcig ’grel pa nyi ma’i snang ba (chos kyi grags pa, the first Drigung Chungtsang, 1595–1659). ### [notes.17](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.17) 17. Fo shuo chu jia yuan jing 佛說出家緣經, Taishō no. 791. ### [notes.18](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.18) 18. See Okada 1986. ### [notes.19](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.19) 19. See also Vinītā 2010, p. 98. ### [notes.20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.20) 20. Okada (1986) also states, however, that a translation of The Sūtra of Nandika from An Shigao must have existed, the nan ti jia luo yue jing 難提迦羅越経, \*Nandika­gṛhapati­sūtra, which disappeared at the beginning of the sixth century at the latest. ### [notes.21](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.21) 21. See Feer 1883, pp. 243–49. ### [notes.22](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.22) 22. See Feer 1883, pp. 228–30. Sylvain Lévi, in his introduction to the Mahākarma­vibhaṅga, refers to Feer’s French translation of The Sūtra of Nandika as defective (Lévi 1932, p. 42, n.5). By then, other editions of the Tibetan text were not accessible, and neither was the Sanskrit text, making Feer’s otherwise remarkable pioneer translation work hard to accomplish. Nevertheless, we sometimes consulted Feer’s French translation while preparing our own. ### [notes.23](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.23) 23. Vinītā offers the first critical edition of the two extant Sanskrit Potala manuscripts of the Nandikasūtra, along with their Tibetan (D und KQ) and Chinese parallels. She presents numerous additional information in the notes, such as parallel passages and quotations from other related texts. ### [notes.24](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.24) 24. Also useful was Jonathan Silk’s review of Bhikṣuṇī Vinītā’s work, Silk 2013, pp. 66–70. ### [notes.25](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.25) 25. In Skt1 we find namo buddhāya: “homage to the Buddha.” NSdh reads thams chad mkhyen pa la phyag ’tshal lo: “homage to the Omniscient One.” ### [notes.26](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.26) 26. NSdh omits “who surrounded and honored him as he taught the Dharma.” ### [notes.27](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.27) 27. Missing in Skt1, Skt2, Taishō 791, and NSdh. The Sanskrit text of this passage can be easily found in other texts, such as the Divyāva­dāna (Vaidya 1959, p. 180), Samādhi­rāja­sūtra (Vaidya 1961, p. 2), Saddharma­puṇḍarīka (Vaidya 1960, p. 12), and Lalitavistara (Vaidya 1958, p. 2). It reads, with the most common way this passage is parsed: sa dharmaṃ deśayati sma ādau kalyāṇaṃ madhye kalyāṇaṃ paryavasāne kalyāṇam/ svarthaṃ suvyañjanaṃ kevalaṃ pari­pūrṇaṃ pari­śuddhaṃ paryavadātaṃ brahma­caryaṃ saṃ­prakāśayati sma: “He taught the Dharma that is good in the beginning, good in the middle, good in the end. He expounded the pure conduct that is excellent in meaning, excellent in words, unique, perfect, completely pure, and thoroughly refined.” In Sanskrit, the punctuation varies, but these qualities are meant either as attributes of the Dharma or pure conduct (brahmacarya). Tibetan translators have understood it in different ways. See, for example, The Sūtra on Transmigration Through Existences (Toh 226, ). See also Mvy 1280–89 for each term. This stock phrase is very common in the Pali Canon as well. It reads, with the most common way this passage is parsed: so dhammaṁ deseti ādikalyāṇaṁ majjhekalyāṇaṁ pari­yosāna­kalyāṇaṁ sātthaṁ sabyañjanaṁ/ kevala­pari­puṇṇaṁ pari­suddhaṁ brahma­cariyaṁ pakāseti: “He taught the Dharma, that is good in the beginning, good in the middle, good in the end, excellent in meaning, and excellent in words. He expounded the pure conduct that is unique, perfect, and completely pure.” The Pali pendant for paryavadātaṃ (“thoroughly refined”) is omitted. See, for example, AN 5.30. ### [notes.28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.28) 28. NSdh has g.yog: “servants.” ### [notes.29](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.29) 29. “Great” is missing in Skt1 but available in Skt2 and NSdh. ### [notes.30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.30) 30. NSdh omits the sentence “circumambulated the Bhagavān three times, and sat down to one side.” ### [notes.31](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.31) 31. Following Skt1, Skt2, F. D, S and He omit “their heads.” ### [notes.32](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.32) 32. This sentence is missing in NSdh. ### [notes.33](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.33) 33. He omits “your eloquence is excellent.” ### [notes.34](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.34) 34. Skt1 reads tac chṛṇu sādhu ca suṣṭhu ca manasikuru: “Listen to it and take it well and duly to heart.” NSdh renders it bstan pa de legs par nyon la rab tu yid la zung shig: “Listen well to this teaching and take it duly to heart!” ### [notes.35](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.35) 35. Skt1 omits this item. Skt2 reads amana­āpadarśano bhavati: “one’s appearance will be unpleasant” and NSdh reads blta na myi sdug pa yin: “one is unpleasant to look at.” ### [notes.36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.36) 36. Skt1 has only svayaṃ saṃtrāsam āpadyate: “one will experience fear,” while Skt2 reads sattvāni cāsyottrāsam āpadyante: “beings are afraid of one.” ### [notes.37](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.37) 37. Skt1 reads duḥkhaṃ ca svapiti duḥkhaṃ ca prati­budhyate: “one sleeps uneasily and awakes uneasily.” This corresponds to item 6) in Skt2. NSdh, Toh 338, and Toh 339 agree with Skt1. ### [notes.38](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.38) 38. Skt1 has corrupt samūlaś ca kālaṃ karoti: “one dies entirely,” but Skt2 has saṃmūḍhaś, agreeing with the Tibetan rmongs pa dang bcas pa. Cf. Toh 338 rmugs te tshe ’pho ba’i dus byed pa dang: “one dies in dullness.” ### [notes.39](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.39) 39. In the Tibetan here and in the subsequent lists of ten negative consequences, (8) and (9) are presented as a single causally connected sentence. However we have opted to follow Bhikṣuṇī Vinītā’s numbering of the negative consequences, as based on the Sanskrit. ### [notes.40](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.40) 40. This question is missing in Skt1, but included in Skt2, which adds tadyathā: “thus.” ### [notes.41](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.41) 41. Following the Tibetan, bag tsha ba chen po. Skt1 reads āśaṅkā: “distrusted” but Skt2 reads guruśaṅkī, which Vinītā emends to gurvāśaṅkī, corresponding to the Tibetan. ### [notes.42](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.42) 42. Tib. phye ma red kyi dus su ’gro ba ’gyur. Skt1 and NSdh omit this last sentence, but Skt2 agrees with D. It appears that the Tibetan offers two alternative interpretations of the Sanskrit akāla here, which can mean both “at the wrong time” and “at night.” ### [notes.43](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.43) 43. Skt1 reads gṛhīta, while Skt2 reads parigṛhīta, matching the Tibetan yongs su zin par. ### [notes.44](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.44) 44. Vinītā emends Skt1 vairopasarggī: “troubled by hostility” to rājopasargī as in Skt2, Tibetan, and Taishō 791. F omits this sentence. ### [notes.45](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.45) 45. Skt1 reads duṣṭopasargī ca bhavati: “one becomes troubled by villains.” Skt2 omits this sentence. ### [notes.46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.46) 46. In the Tibetan these three are presented in three different sentences. ### [notes.47](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.47) 47. Skt2 adds alpabhogaś ca: “and (will have) little wealth.” ### [notes.48](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.48) 48. Tib. rbad pa chen pos. Skt1 and Skt2 read utthāna­vīryādhigatā (Vinītā gives utthāna­vīryāvigatā): “that comes from effort and diligence.” ### [notes.49](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.49) 49. Following Skt1 nihitāś cāsya: “one’s deposited property.” ### [notes.50](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.50) 50. Tib. sbas pas. Skt1 and Skt2 have instead of “secrets” caurato: “by robbers.” Cf. The Sūtra of the Question of Subāhu (Toh 70), . ### [notes.51](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.51) 51. Skt1 and Skt2 read yeṣāṃ dārān abhimardayati: “whose spouses one ruins.” ### [notes.52](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.52) 52. Following the Tibetan, ma zhi ba bar ’gyur. Vinītā emends Skt1 according to Skt2 as ātmā cāsyāgupto bhavaty arakṣitaḥ, jīvitaṃ cāsyāguptaṃ bhavaty arakṣitaṃ: “he himself becomes unguarded and unprotected, and his life becomes unguarded and unprotected.” ### [notes.53](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.53) 53. Skt1 and Skt2 reads putradāraṃ cāsyāguptaṃ bhavaty arakṣitaṃ: “his son and wife become unguarded and unprotected.” ### [notes.54](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.54) 54. In Skt1 part of item (4). ### [notes.55](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.55) 55. Following F yid phebs par mi ’gyur ba dang, Skt1 and Skt2 read cāsya viśvāsaṃ na gacchanti. D reads yid ’bebs par mi ’gyur ba dang. On the meaning of yid la ’bebs pa see Vinītā 2010, p. 119, n. c. ### [notes.56](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.56) 56. Read with Skt1. The causal connection between (8) and (9) is clearly expressed in D and all other Tibetan canonical versions. D reads ’gran zla dang bcas par ’gyur ba’i las byas shing bsags pas: “because one has committed and accumulated deeds leading to rivalry.” ### [notes.57](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.57) 57. Skt1 and Skt2 omit “protective.” ### [notes.58](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.58) 58. Tib. phyir ldang ba’i ’os ma yin pa, Skt1 apratyutthānārhaś, lit. “will not be worthy of rising again.” Here we have followed Vinītā’s interpretation of the Skt. pratyutthāna as “rising from a seat to welcome a visitor, respectful salutation or reception.” ### [notes.59](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.59) 59. Skt1 adds bahu-: “much.” ### [notes.60](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.60) 60. Tibetan reads mi snyan pa brjod pa: “offenses.” ### [notes.61](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.61) 61. The literature on the negative consequences of intoxicating drinks is not completely consistent. Some works refer to thirty-five, others to thirty-six, and some to forty negative consequences. The content of these lists also varies. Skt1 and Taishō 791 list thirty-five, Skt2 lists thirty-six. When referring to this passage of the Nandikasūtra, two Sanskrit manuscripts of the Mahākarma­vibhaṅga mention thirty-five and one mentions forty disadvantages. The \*Mahā­prajñā­pāramitā­śāstra lists thirty-six; the Putralekha (Toh 4187) refers to thirty-five; Transformation of Karma (Toh 339) lists thirty-five; The Exposition of Karma (Toh 388) refers to thirty-five, but then lists thirty-six . Kawa Paltsek’s An Account of the Precious Teachings together with a Lineage of the Śākya Clan (Toh 4357), a Tengyur text that quotes from several texts contained in the Potala manuscript, refers to thirty-six negative consequences. For more information on this topic in the Chinese canonical literature see Vinītā 2010, p. 126, n. a. ### [notes.62](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.62) 62. Tib. ’bru’i chang dang bcos pa’i chang; Skt1 and Skt2: surāmaireyamadya. ### [notes.63](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.63) 63. Skt1 and Skt2 read rogānām āyatanaṃ: “it is the cause of illnesses.” ### [notes.64](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.64) 64. Skt1 and Skt2 have vivardhana: “increase.” ### [notes.65](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.65) 65. Skt1 and Skt2 read kaupīnasaṃ­darśanam: “(one’s) private parts are exposed.” The Exposition of Karma (Toh 338) is closer to Sanskrit: sba ba’i gnas ston pa dang: “and (one will) show the private parts.” ### [notes.66](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.66) 66. Tib. longs spyod thob pa mi ’thob pa ’gyur, lit. “obtained wealth will not be obtained.” Skt1 and Skt2 read anadhigatāś ca bhogā nādhi­gacchanti: “wealth that has not been obtained will not reach him.” The parallel phrase in The Exposition of Karma (Toh 338) has the preferable Tibetan reading ma thob pa’i longs spyod rnams mi ’thob pa dang: “\[one\] will not obtain wealth that has not already been obtained.” ### [notes.67](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.67) 67. Skt1 and Skt2 read guhyaṃ ca vivṛṇoti: “and one reveals a secret.” ### [notes.68](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.68) 68. Missing in Skt1, but present in Skt2. ### [notes.69](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.69) 69. This last sentence is missing in Skt1 but present in Skt2: duḥśīlaś ca bhavati. ### [notes.70](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.70) 70. Missing in Skt1 but present in Skt2: indriyeṣvagupta­dvāro bhavati. ### [notes.71](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.71) 71. Skt1 omits jana: “people.” ### [notes.72](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.72) 72. Skt1 reads akarma­prati­grāhakaś ca bhavati: “and one commits crime.” Skt2 reads adharmma­pratigrāhakaś ca bhavati: “and one accepts that which is not dharma.” ### [notes.73](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.73) 73. Skt1 reads apatrāpya­parivarjitaś ca bhavati: “he becomes devoid of shame.” Skt2 reads nihrīko bhavati/ anapatrāpī bhavati: “he becomes shameless and indecent.” ### [notes.74](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.74) 74. Skt1 reads na cainaṃ vidvāṃsaḥ pratyayeṣu sthāneṣu pari­praṣṭavyaṃ manyante: “the learned do not think of asking him on matters of reason/proof.” Skt2 reads pratyutpanneṣu kāryeṣu na cainaṃ vidvāṃsaḥ pari­praṣṭavyaṃ manyante: “when the need arises, the learned do not think of asking him.” ### [notes.75](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.75) 75. We understand nyam bag tu as “negligently,” supported by Skt1 and Skt2 upekṣako and Feer’s translation: “avec negligence.” ### [notes.76](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.76) 76. Skt1 and Skt2 read only vacana: “words.” ### [notes.77](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.77) 77. The Tibetan perfect form spangs renders the Skt. vivarjayed: “should abandon.” See Beyer 1992 (p. 363, n.11) for the use of the perfect for commands. ### [notes.78](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.78) 78. Skt1 has jīvitaṃ paraṃ: “next life,” but Skt2 has jīvitaṃ priyaṃ: “beloved life,” as in Tibetan. ### [notes.79](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.79) 79. Vinītā and Feer have acknowledged the difficulty of translating this verse. We follow, with some changes, the translation suggested by Jonathan Silk in his review of Vinītā (Silk 2013, p.70). Skt1 and Skt2 read parasya vittaṃ bahuduḥkhasaṃcitaṃ/ na cāpy adattaṃ manasāpi saṃspṛśet/ dṛṣṭvāpi loke priyaviprayogaṃ/ tathaiva cānyeṣu hitāya tiṣṭhet: “Others have acquired wealth with much difficulty, so one should not touch, even mentally, what is not given. Having experienced separation from what one loves in the world, just so one should be steady for the benefit of others.” ### [notes.80](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.80) 80. Skt2 matches the Tibetan perfectly, but Skt1 is corrupt: vivarjayet prajvalitam ivoktvāṃ. ### [notes.81](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.81) 81. Skt2 svakeṣu dāreṣu labheta tuṣṭiṃ: “one should find contentment with one’s own wives.” Skt1 is corrupt and reads svakeṣu dāreṣu na labheta tuṣṭiṃ: “one should not find contentment with one’s own wives.” ### [notes.82](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.82) 82. Vinītā’s emendation of Skt1 was very helpful here: prāṇaṃ na hanyān na haret parasvaṃ/ mṛṣā na bhāṣen na pibec ca madyam/ parasya bhāryāṃ manasāpi necchet/ svargaṃ ya icchet gṛhavat praviṣṭum. Skt2 and Gilgit diverge from Skt1. ### [notes.83](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.83) 83. Read with KY, J, N, C, H: gos dkar gyon pa khyim pa rnams kyis ni/ /khyim gnas rnams kyi bslab pa ’di yin te/ /rgyal bas de gong rab tu byung rnams kyi bslab gzhi’i chos ni rab tu bstan pa yin. D reads de gang instead of de gong. Vinītā’s emendation of Skt1 reads gṛhīṇa tāvac chitavastra­dhāriṇām/ agāram adhyāvasatām ime ’naghāḥ/ ato bhuyo pravrajitasya deśitā/ jinena śikṣapāda­dharmadeśanā: “Firstly, these are the faultless \[precepts\] of householders who wear white clothes and dwell at home; beyond this is the instruction on the teaching about the basic precepts for the renunciate taught by the Victorious One.” ### [notes.84](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.84) 84. Skt1 and Skt2 add hṛṣṭa: “merry.” ### [notes.85](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000.notes.85) 85. Skt1 reads idam avocad bhagavān āttamanāḥ. te ca bhikṣavo bhagavato bhāṣitam abhyanandann iti: “The delighted Bhagavān had thus spoken, and the monks rejoiced in what the Bhagavān had taught.” Skt2 reads idam avocad bhagavān āttamanā nandi­kopāsakaḥ pañca­śataparivāras te ca bhikṣavo bhagavato bhāṣitam abhyanandann iti: “The Bhagavān had thus spoken, and the delighted layman Nandika with his retinue of five hundred and the monks rejoiced in what the Bhagavān had taught.” In Skt2 the adjective āttamanās (delighted) could apply to the Bhagavān or to Nandika, but Nandika has already left the Buddha’s presence. --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.nandikasutra*bo~en-84000) · Pramāṇa