[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Buddhist Sanskrit literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit) › [Āgama sūtras of the mainstream schools](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama) › [Sūtras of the Connected Discourses transmitted singly](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta) › [Satpuruṣa](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.satpurusa) › [འཕགས་པ་སྐྱེས་བུ་དམ་པའི་མདོ](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.satpurusa*bo) › [The Good Person](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.satpurusa*bo~en-84000) › notes.3 # འཕགས་པ་སྐྱས་བ་དམ་པའ་མད notes.3 The Good Person notes.3 - **Language:** English ### [notes.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.satpurusa*bo~en-84000.notes.3) 3. In Mahāyāna literature, this quite common division is discussed, for example, in the Yogācārabhūmi—in particular, the Dānapaṭala chapter of Bodhisattva­bhūmi. Cf. Wogihara, 132.19–22 \[ tatra katamad bodhisattvasya satpuruṣasya satpuruṣadānaṃ / yad bodhisattvaḥ śraddhayā dānaṃ dadāti satkṛtya svahastena kālena parān anupahatya / idaṃ bodhisattvasya satpuruṣasya satpuruṣa­dānam ity ucyate /\]. Cf. also the interpretation of that fragment in McCombs (2014), p. 265ff. - [Previous: notes.2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.satpurusa*bo~en-84000.notes.2) - [Next: notes.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.satpurusa*bo~en-84000.notes.4) - [Up: notes](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.satpurusa*bo~en-84000.notes) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.satpurusa*bo~en-84000.notes.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.agama.samyukta.satpurusa*bo~en-84000.notes.3) · Pramāṇa