[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Buddhist Sanskrit literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit) › [Mahāyāna sūtras](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra) › [Lalitavistara](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra.lalitavistara) › [འཕགས་པ་རྒྱ་ཆེར་རོལ་པ་ཞེས་བྱ་བ་ཐེག་པ་ཆེན་པོའི་མདོ](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra.lalitavistara*bo) › [The Play in Full](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra.lalitavistara*bo~en-84000) › notes # འཕགས་པ་རྒྱ་ཆར་རལ་པ་ཞས་བྱ་བ་ཐག་པ་ཆན་པའ་མད notes: Notes The Play in Full notes - **Language:** English ### Notes ### [notes.1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra.lalitavistara*bo~en-84000.notes.1) 1. See Miller (forthcoming). ### [notes.2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra.lalitavistara*bo~en-84000.notes.2) 2. We are grateful to Jonathan Silk (Silk 2022, p. 273, n. 15) for pointing out a number of errors and omissions in an earlier version of this paragraph. ### [notes.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra.lalitavistara*bo~en-84000.notes.3) 3. Hokazono 1994, 2019a, 2019b. ### [notes.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra.lalitavistara*bo~en-84000.notes.4) 4. At the time of translation the edition of Hokazono (Hokazono 1994, 2019a, 2019b) mentioned above was unavailable to us. Since it appears to be a considerable improvement on Lefman’s, we expect to benefit from a close reading of it in a planned future update of this translation. ### [notes.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra.lalitavistara*bo~en-84000.notes.5) 5. The Sanskrit here has Kauṇḍinya, who (with his title Ajñāta-) has already been mentioned. However, Negi cites this and one another instance to suggest the possibility that the Tibetan gsus po che is sometimes used to refer to Kauṇḍinya. ### [notes.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra.lalitavistara*bo~en-84000.notes.6) 6. The four rivers is a technical term for the streams (ogha) that are identical to the four “outflows” (āśrava), namely, sensual desires, desire for cyclic existence, wrong views, and ignorance. ### [notes.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra.lalitavistara*bo~en-84000.notes.7) 7. The translation is based on the Sanskrit. ### [notes.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra.lalitavistara*bo~en-84000.notes.8) 8. The translation of the verses in the following section is primarily based on the Sanskrit. ### [notes.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra.lalitavistara*bo~en-84000.notes.9) 9. This is the first time the text shifts to the first person. ### [notes.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra.lalitavistara*bo~en-84000.notes.10) 10. The translation is based on the Tibetan tsa sha (Skt. cāṣa); the Sanskrit has apsaras. ### [notes.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra.lalitavistara*bo~en-84000.notes.11) 11. The following six verses are missing in the Sanskrit text. ### [notes.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra.lalitavistara*bo~en-84000.notes.12) 12. The first three lines of this verse are missing in the Sanskrit text. ### [notes.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra.lalitavistara*bo~en-84000.notes.13) 13. According to Lefmann’s edition of the Sanskrit and the Tibetan chos ’dod. Vaidya’s Sanskrit has Dharmakāya as the second name here. ### [notes.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra.lalitavistara*bo~en-84000.notes.14) 14. This is the first of the “thirty-two marks of a great being,” the rest of which are listed in the paragraphs that follow. ### [notes.15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra.lalitavistara*bo~en-84000.notes.15) 15. In the passsage that follows, the translation follows the structure of the Sanskrit rather than the Tibetan. ### [notes.16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra.lalitavistara*bo~en-84000.notes.16) 16. With this paragraph begins a list of the “ten powers (bala) of a thus-gone one.” ### [notes.17](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra.lalitavistara*bo~en-84000.notes.17) 17. With this paragraph begins a list of the “four confidences (vaiśāradya) of a thus-gone one.” ### [notes.18](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra.lalitavistara*bo~en-84000.notes.18) 18. The qualities listed from this paragraph until 26.205 correspond, with some variations, to enumerations in other texts of the “eighteen unique qualities of a buddha” (āvenika­buddha­dharma). ### [notes.19](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra.lalitavistara*bo~en-84000.notes.19) 19. From the following paragraph onward, the translation follows the Tibetan structure again. --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra.lalitavistara*bo~en-84000.notes](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.mahayanasutra.lalitavistara*bo~en-84000.notes) · Pramāṇa