Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

Teaching the Fundamental Exposition and Detailed Analysis of Dependent Arising

Translation of རྟན་ཅང་འབྲལ་བར་འབྱང་བ་དང་པ་དང་རྣམ་པར་དབྱ་བ་བསྟན་པ་ཞས་བྱ་བའ་མད (རྟེན་ཅིང་འབྲེལ་བར་འབྱུང་བ་དང་པོ་དང་རྣམ་པར་དབྱེ་བ་བསྟན་པ་ཞེས་བྱ་བའི་མདོ)

Language
English
Translator
Annie Bien
Extent
20 passages, 1,867 words
Text
complete digital text
Source
84000 · Translated by Annie Bien under the patronage and supervision of 84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha.… · CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (84000: Translating the Words of the Buddha). Shown whole and unaltered, with its notes, on a…

Contents

Text

84000's introduction

intro.1

In the Jeta’s Grove outside Śrāvastī, monks have gathered to listen to the Buddha as he presents the foundational doctrine of dependent arising. The Buddha first gives the definition of dependent arising and then teaches the twelve factors that form the causal chain of existence in saṃsāra as well as the defining characteristics of these twelve factors.

intro.2

Dependent arising is one of the core teachings of Buddhism. The canonical accounts of the Buddha’s awakening relate how at first he hesitated to describe the profound realization he had attained, given how difficult it would be for others to comprehend. At last, persuaded to speak of his discovery, the Buddha began by teaching the four truths of the noble ones. Then, to explain in more detail the causes of suffering and its cessation, he taught the aggregates, how they are misconstrued as a self, and the theory of dependent arising, based in part on the pan-Indian idea of moral causation, as a means to gain insight into the nature of reality. This teaching was later analyzed in great detail by the various Buddhist philosophical schools. It is a topic discussed in many other sūtras and has been widely interpreted in commentaries by the Buddhist traditions.

intro.3

Teaching the Fundamental Exposition and Detailed Analysis of Dependent Arising takes place in Śrāvastī, the ancient capital of the Kośala state located near the Rapti River in what is today northeastern Uttar Pradesh. In Buddhist India, Śrāvastī was famous for housing the Jeta’s Grove monastery. This monastery was erected in a park, outside the city, which had been donated to the Buddha and his community by the wealthy benefactor Anāthapiṇḍada. Tradition relates that the Buddha spent twenty-four rainy seasons at this important monastery. The sūtra begins with the Buddha teaching a congregation of monks. He first presents the topic of dependent arising and summarizes the doctrine: “If this exists, that arises; by this having been produced, that is produced.” Whatever is born has arisen in reliance on causes and conditions, with no cause or condition being primary or absolute. In this there is no phenomenon that exists independently. This general meaning of dependent arising applies to both animate and inanimate objects. In his teaching the Buddha then explains how twelve progressively arising factors cause beings to continuously take birth, age, and die, only to become born anew. These twelve factors are described as the progressive chain of events that accounts for the perpetual suffering of saṃsāra. After presenting the twelve links, the Buddha elucidates them with a detailed analysis, subdividing and defining each of the twelve factors.

intro.4

The sūtra is today extant in Sanskrit as well as Chinese, Tibetan, Korean, and Mongolian translations. The Sanskrit is found as part of the Nidānasaṃyukta collection.¹ Indian commentaries on this text (today extant only in Tibetan translation) were written by Vasubandhu (fourth–fifth century ce, Toh 3995² ) and Guṇamati (sixth century ce, Toh 3996³ ). The text was translated several times into Chinese, first by Kumārajīva in the early fifth century ce (Taishō 123) and later by Hsüan-tsang in 661 ce (Taishō 124). Apart from these two independent translations, the sūtra was also translated by Guṇabhadra in the early fifth century CE as part of his translation of the Saṃyuktāgama (Taishō 99).

intro.5

The Tibetan translation has no colophon, so we do not know when or by whom it was produced. It is, however, included in the Denkarma inventory of translated texts, compiled at a date in the early ninth century thought to have been 812 ce, so it must have been translated at the latest by that date.⁴

intro.6

This English translation is based on the Tibetan translation in the Degé Kangyur in consultation with the Comparative Edition (Tib. dpe bsdur ma). We also consulted the Sanskrit editions by Tripathi (1962) and Vaidya (Ānandajoti 2009).

1

Homage to the Three Jewels.⁵

Thus did I hear at one time. The Bhagavān was dwelling in Śrāvastī, in Jeta’s Grove, Anāthapiṇḍada’s Park.⁶

Then the Bhagavān spoke to the monks: “Monks,⁷ I shall teach you the fundamental exposition and detailed analysis of dependent arising. Listen very well and bear this in mind as I explain. What is the fundamental exposition of dependent arising? It is thus: if this exists, that arises; by this having been produced, that is produced.

“It is thus: through the condition of ignorance, formations arise; through the condition of formations, consciousness arises; through the condition of consciousness, name-and-form arises; through the condition of name-and-form, the six sense sources arise; through the condition of the six sense sources, contact arises; through the condition of contact, feeling arises; through the condition of feeling, craving arises; through the condition of craving, grasping arises; through the condition of grasping, existence arises; through the condition of existence, birth arises; through the condition of birth, aging and death—as well as sorrow, lamentation, suffering, unhappiness, and strife—arise. In this way, this sole great heap of suffering arises. This is the fundamental exposition of dependent arising.

“What is the detailed analysis of dependent arising? What is ignorance in the statement, ‘Through the condition of ignorance, formations arise’? It is not knowing the past, not knowing the future, and not knowing either the past or the future. It is not knowing the inner, not knowing the outer, and not knowing either the inner or the outer. It is not knowing actions, not knowing their maturation, and not knowing either actions

2

or their maturation. It is not knowing the Buddha, not knowing the Dharma, not knowing the Saṅgha. It is not knowing suffering, origin, cessation, or the path. It is not knowing the causes and not knowing that phenomena arise from causes. It is not knowing virtue and nonvirtue. It is not knowing unseemliness and not knowing the absence of unseemliness. It is not knowing what to engage in and what not to engage in. It is not knowing what is bad, sublime, negative, or positive. It is not knowing the phenomena that dependently arise within such divisions. It is failing to understand the six sense sources of contact just as they are. It is not knowing what is and how it is. It is not seeing and not understanding. It is being confused, deluded, ignorant, and obscured. This is ignorance.

“What are formations in the statement, ‘Through the condition of ignorance, formations arise’? They are threefold. What are the three?⁸ They are the formations of the body, the formations of speech, and the formations of the mind.

“What is consciousness in the statement, ‘Through the condition of formations, consciousness arises’? It is the six collections of consciousness: the consciousnesses of the eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind.

“What is name in the statement, ‘Through the condition of consciousness, name-and-form arises’? It is the four formless aggregates. They are the aggregate of feeling, the aggregate of perception, the aggregate of formations, and the aggregate of consciousness.

“What is form? Whatever form there may be, it is all the four great elements and form derived from the four great elements. In this way, when both form and the aforementioned name are taken together, they are called name-and-form.⁹

“What are the six sense sources in the statement, ‘Through the condition of name-and-form, the six sense sources arise’? There are six inner sense sources: the inner sense sources of the eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind.

3

“What is contact in the statement, ‘Through the condition of the six sense sources, contact arises’? There are six collections of contact: being conjoined with the eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind. This is contact.

“What is feeling in the statement, ‘Through the condition of contact, feeling arises’? There are three feelings: pleasure, pain, and neither pleasure nor pain.

“What is craving in the statement, ‘Through the condition of feeling, craving arises’? There are three cravings: the craving of the desire realm, the craving of the form realm, and the craving of the formless realm.

“What is grasping in the statement, ‘Through the condition of craving, grasping arises’? Grasping is of four types: grasping at desire, grasping at views, grasping at moral rules and vows and rites, and grasping at theories that assert the self.

“What is existence in the statement, ‘Through the condition of grasping, existence arises’? There are three existences: the existences of the desire realm, the form realm, and the formless realm.

“What is birth in the statement, ‘Through the condition of existence, birth arises’? Birth refers to the way a being is born into a particular class of beings. It refers to conception, entrance, maturation, manifestation, obtaining aggregates, obtaining elements, obtaining sense sources, fully developing aggregates, and the manifestation of the life faculty.

“What is aging in the statement, ‘Through the condition of birth, aging and death arise’? Aging refers to becoming bald, white haired, wrinkled, worn out, slack, hunched like a cow drinking water, covered with liver spots, having drooping limbs, being afflicted with rheumatism, breathing heavily, walking hunched over, walking with a stick, feeling unwell and lethargic, being weakened, being exhausted, having impaired faculties, losing one’s memory, and becoming old and decrepit. This is called aging.

“What is death?

4

Death is the departure or passing away of each and every being from their respective class of sentient beings; it is their disintegration, internal deterioration, loss of life, fading of bodily warmth, cessation of the life faculty, discarding of the aggregates, dying, and decease. Combining the two into one, death with the aforementioned aging, this is known as aging and death. This is the detailed analysis of dependent arising.

“O monks, I said that I would explain to you the fundamental exposition and detailed analysis of dependent arising, and they are as I have now described them.”¹⁰

Notes

notes.1

1. The Nidānasaṃyukta is a collection of canonical texts that present the topic of causation. The collection is part of the Saṃyuktāgama of the Sarvāstivāda school. It has partially survived in Sanskrit in the form of manuscript fragments discovered in Central Asia. This collection was also translated in its entirety into Chinese (Taishō 99). Many of the texts in the Nidānasaṃyukta (although not the sūtra translated here) are also included in the Pāli Nidānasaṃyutta collection of the Saṃyuttanikāya. For a Sanskrit edition of Teaching the Fundamental Exposition and Detailed Analysis of Dependent Arising, see Tripathi (1962). See also Ānandajoti (2009) for an online edition by P.L. Vaidya. See also Mejor (1997) for a study of this sūtra.

notes.2

2. Pratītyasamutpādādivibhaṅganirdeśa (rten cing ’brel bar ’byung ba dang po ’i rnam par dbye ba bshad pa).

notes.3

3. Pratītyasamutpādādivibhaṅganirdeśaṭīkā (rten cing ’brel bar ’byung ba dang po dang rnam par dbye ba bstan pa’i rgya cher bshad pa).

notes.4

4. See Denkarma, F.301.a.3. See also Herrmann-Pfandt (2008), 161–162, no. 297.

notes.5

5. This phrase is omitted in Vaidya’s Sanskrit edition.

notes.6

6. The Sanskrit in Vaidya’s edition continues this sentence: “…together with a great saṅgha of monks containing twelve hundred and fifty monks.”

notes.7

7. Tripathi’s Sanskrit edition begins here.

notes.8

8. This question is omitted in Tripathi’s and Vaidya’s editions.

notes.9

9. Tripathi’s Sanskrit edition reads: “In this way, when both form and the aforementioned name are taken together, they are name-and-form. This is called name-and-form.”

notes.10

10. Tripathi’s Sanskrit edition ends here. After this paragraph, Vaidya’s edition includes the customary statement: “The monks, uplifted, rejoiced in the teaching of the Blessed One.”