[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [金剛般若經疏論纂要](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1701) › 1.89 # 金剛般若經疏論纂要 1.89 金剛般若經疏論纂要 1.89 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.89](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1701.1.89) 非但佛身無相，但是一切凡聖依正、有為之相盡是虛妄，以從妄念所變現故。妄念本空，所變何實？故《起信》云「一切境界唯依妄念而有差別，若離心念，即無一切境界之相。若見諸相等者，遮離色觀空也。」恐聞相是虛妄，又別求無相佛身，故云「相即非相便是如來」，不唯佛化身相是如來，所見一切相相皆無相即如來也。故《起信》云「所言覺義者，謂心體離念。離念相者等虛空界，即是如來平等法身。」肇云：「行合解通則為見佛。」偈云「離彼是如來者，離彼三相是法身如來也。」無著則於色身但離遍計，不執色相即真色身，故彼論云「此為顯示如來色身。」又，此當第三欲得色身住處。 > Not only is the Buddha-body markless, but all conditioned marks—common and noble, container world and sentient beings—are entirely illusory, because they are transformed and manifested from false thoughts. False thoughts are fundamentally empty; how could what is transformed \[by them\] be real? Therefore the Awakening of Faith says: 'All realms have differences only relying on false thoughts; if separated from thoughts of the mind, there are no marks of any realms at all. "If one sees that all marks..." and so forth prevents contemplating emptiness apart from form.' Fearing that upon hearing marks are illusory one would separately seek a markless Buddha-body, it says 'marks being non-marks is itself the Tathāgata'; not only is the mark of the Buddha's nirmāṇakāya the Tathāgata, but all marks seen being markless is itself the Tathāgata. Therefore the Awakening of Faith says: 'The meaning of awakening is that the essence of mind is free from thought. That which is free from the marks of thought is equal to the realm of empty space; this is the Tathāgata's equal dharmakāya.' Sengzhao says: 'When practice matches and understanding penetrates, that is seeing the Buddha.' The verse says: '"Free from those is the Tathāgata" means being free from those three marks is the dharmakāya Tathāgata.' Asaṅga, however, merely separates the physical body from the imagined nature (parikalpita); not grasping at bodily marks is the true physical body. Hence that treatise says: 'This is to reveal the Tathāgata's physical body.' Furthermore, this corresponds to the third abiding place of desiring to attain the physical body. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.88](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1701.1.88) - [Next: 1.90](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1701.1.90) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1701.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1701~en-mt.1.89) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1701.1.89](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1701.1.89) · Pramāṇa