[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [金剛經纂要刊定記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1702) › 1.102 # 金剛經纂要刊定記 1.102 金剛經纂要刊定記 1.102 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.102](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1702.1.102) 後學下斥其違論。即無著、天親之後，製疏之者也。何疑者責辭也。添即前云配入名相者。於本論外，加以大小乘法相行位故云添。棄即前云但云一真者。棄却兩論別自解釋也。不知彼人云我勝菩薩為，復不知菩薩所造論耶。若言不是我勝菩薩，亦非不知造論，但以志道參玄忘言取意，截徑修進不務枝流，誰有心力尋於論文者，即應責之曰：「尋論釋經則推無心力，推胸率意心力何多。」且者約截之辭。以不論所餘截徑而斥意云：「今不論儞有理無理，且論主是入位上流，復從彌勒所受義句，此蓋佛佛相傳展轉師授。儞之後學，何得固違而自率意耶？一是凡聖愚智懸隔。二是師父之言。背智率愚、悖師無禮，如父有所作子乃故違，豈合天道耶！」故此引師以斥也。 > From "later scholars" below, he rebukes their deviation from the treatises. That is, those who composed commentaries after Asaṅga and Vasubandhu. "How can there be doubt?" is an expression of reproach. "Addition" is what was mentioned earlier as matching with technical terms: outside of the root treatises, adding the dharmalakṣaṇa and stages of practice of the Great and Small Vehicles; hence it is called "addition." "Abandonment" is what was mentioned earlier as merely speaking of the single true: casting aside the two treatises and providing their own separate explanations. I do not know whether those people say, "I surpass the bodhisattvas," or whether they do not know the treatises composed by the bodhisattvas. If they say, "It is not that I surpass the bodhisattvas, nor is it that I do not know of the treatises composed, but simply that by setting my aspiration on the Way and participating in the profound, forgetting words and seizing the meaning, cutting directly across to cultivate and advance without attending to branches and streams, who has the mental energy to investigate the treatise texts?"—then one should reproach them, saying: "When it comes to investigating treatises to explain the sūtra you claim to lack mental energy, yet when speculating from the heart and following whim, how is your mental energy so abundant?" "Moreover" is a phrase that cuts through the matter. Without debating the rest of their direct shortcuts, he rebukes them with the meaning: "Now, setting aside whether you have principle or lack principle, for now \[consider that\] the treatise authors are superior persons who have entered the bhūmis, and furthermore received the meanings and phrases from Maitreya; this is indeed transmitted from Buddha to Buddha, passed down through masters. How can you later scholars stubbornly violate this and follow your own whims? First, ordinary beings and sages, the foolish and the wise, are suspended far apart. Second, these are the words of masters and fathers. Turning one's back on wisdom to follow foolishness, rebelling against one's teachers without etiquette, is like a son intentionally defying what his father has done—how could it accord with the Heavenly Way?" Therefore, he cites the teachers to rebuke them. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.101](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1702.1.101) - [Next: 1.103](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1702.1.103) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1702.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1702~en-mt.1.102) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1702.1.102](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1702.1.102) · Pramāṇa