<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1702.7.136 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [金剛經纂要刊定記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1702) › 7.136

# 金剛經纂要刊定記 7.136

金剛經纂要刊定記 7.136

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [7.136](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1702.7.136)

云何下。結成疑也。涅槃即是不動無為義，如前文云：「若人言如來若來去坐臥，即不解所說義。如來者，無所從來亦無所去，故名如來。」斯則佛入涅槃也。意云：涅槃寂靜、說法喧動，動寂相反，云何兩存？經徵意云：以何義故，佛常說而不閡涅槃，如論所敘？釋意云：常佛有妙智，觀諸法空如夢幻等，雖現說法似有為相，而常住涅槃無作之理，復何疑哉？若於論外不作斷疑釋者，此文但責說法不染。徵意云：以何義故，說法之時不取於相，得合真如不動不染耶？釋意云：但觀諸有為相，猶如夢幻等，自然於說不取不著契合真如，無有動搖分別等也。

> "Why, etc.": concluding into the doubt. Nirvāṇa is the meaning of unmoving asaṃskṛta. As the earlier text says: "If someone says that the Tathāgata comes, goes, sits, or lies down, they do not understand the meaning of what I say. The Tathāgata neither comes from anywhere nor goes anywhere; therefore he is called the Tathāgata." This, then, is the Buddha's entry into nirvāṇa. The point is: nirvāṇa is serene quietude, while preaching the Dharma is clamorous activity; activity and quietude are mutually opposed, so how can both coexist? The sūtra's interrogation means: by what principle does the Buddha constantly speak without obstructing nirvāṇa, as stated in the treatise? The commentary's explanation means: the constant Buddha possesses wondrous wisdom, contemplating all phenomena as empty like dreams, illusions, and the like; although manifesting the expounding of the Dharma resembling saṃskṛta marks, he eternally abides in the principle of non-action in nirvāṇa—what further doubt could there be? If one does not explain this as severing doubt outside of the treatise, this text merely faults defilement in preaching the Dharma. The interrogation means: by what principle, at the time of preaching the Dharma, does one not grasp at marks and succeed in tallying with tathatā, unmoving and undefiled? The explanation means: one merely contemplates all saṃskṛta marks as being like dreams, illusions, and the like; naturally, regarding speech, one neither grasps nor clings, tallying with tathatā without movement or vikalpa.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 7.135](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1702.7.135)
- [Next: 7.137](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1702.7.137)
- [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1702.7)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1702~en-mt.7.136) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1702.7.136](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1702.7.136) · Pramāṇa
