[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [仁王護國般若經疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1705) › 4.14 # 仁王護國般若經疏 4.14 仁王護國般若經疏 4.14 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [4.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1705.4.14) 問：此經云無、餘經云有，如何會通？答：此經云無，無變易眾生；餘經云有，有變易眾生。故《大論》云「聲聞生界外白銀世界，無煩惱名。只約無煩惱，即云無眾生。而聲聞無明未斷，豈實無耶？」此文正是通教意，偏論界內煩惱眾生也。衛世師外道說有六諦，大有經是其一諦。彼經說云「此三界外別有世界」，若言三界外別有眾生，同彼外道說也。實理而論，若言界外有眾生，即同外道；若言無，即同二乘。諸佛菩薩見者即不有不無，不有不無即非如非異，非如非異即不如三界見於三界。如斯等事，《法華》中佛方顯了說也。「大王我常」下，第三引昔證今。我昔常說：斷三界煩惱果報盡名為佛。豈於三界外別有眾生耶？「自性清淨名薩云若性」者，即正因佛性。一切眾生佛及菩薩同共有此，豈於三界外而更別有眾生可化也。「眾生本業」下，第三總結。文二：初總結五忍。眾生本業即煩惱，諸佛菩薩未成道時亦有煩惱，由煩惱故修諸功德智慧今得成佛。佛本煩惱與今眾生無異，故名為本。「五忍中十四忍具足」者，二結廣略。略即五忍，廣即十四。謂三賢是三，十地及佛地成十四也。上來答前問兼利他竟。 > Question: This sūtra says there are none, while other sūtras say there are. How do we reconcile them? Answer: When this sūtra says there are none, there are no beings of transformation; when other sūtras say there are, there are beings of transformation. Therefore, the \*Mahāprajñāpāramitopadeśa\* (\*Dazhidu lun\*) says: "Śrāvakas are born outside the realms in a world of white silver, where the very name 'affliction' does not exist. It is solely with reference to the absence of afflictions that it is said there are no sentient beings. Yet since śrāvakas have not yet severed ignorance, could there truly be none?" This text precisely conveys the intention of the shared teaching, speaking exclusively of the afflicted sentient beings within the realms. The Vaiśeṣika non-Buddhists teach six categories (padārthas), among which the \*Mahābhavasūtra\* (\*Dayou jing\*) is one. That text says: "Apart from these three realms, there is another world." If one says that apart from the three realms there are distinct sentient beings, this is identical to what those non-Buddhists teach. Speaking from the actual principle, if one asserts that there are sentient beings outside the realms, that is identical to non-Buddhists; if one asserts there are none, that is identical to the two vehicles. What the buddhas and bodhisattvas perceive is neither existence nor non-existence; neither existence nor non-existence is neither as-it-is nor different; neither as-it-is nor different means not viewing the three realms as the three realms \[ordinarily\] are. Matters such as these were only explicitly revealed by the Buddha in the \*Lotus Sūtra\*. From "Great King, I have always..." onward is the third \[part\], citing the past to verify the present. I have in the past always said: completely severing the afflictions and retributions of the three realms is termed 'Buddha.' How could there be other sentient beings distinct from the three realms? As for "inherent purity is named the nature of sarvajña," this is the fundamental cause buddha-nature. All sentient beings, buddhas, and bodhisattvas share this alike; how could there be further distinct sentient beings outside the realms to be transformed? From "Sentient beings' fundamental karma..." onward is the third \[part\], the summary conclusion. The text has two parts: first, a general conclusion on the five patiences. Sentient beings' fundamental karma is affliction; before the buddhas and bodhisattvas attained the Way, they also had afflictions, and it was due to afflictions that they cultivated all merits and wisdom and have now attained buddhahood. The Buddha's original afflictions did not differ from those of present sentient beings, so they are termed 'fundamental.' In "within the five patiences, the fourteen patiences are complete," the second \[part\] concludes the expanded and abridged \[forms\]. The abridged is the five patiences; the expanded is the fourteen. That is to say, the three ranks of worthies constitute three, and the daśabhūmi together with the buddha-stage make fourteen. This concludes the above reply to the preceding question along with the benefit for others. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 4.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1705.4.13) - [Next: 4.15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1705.4.15) - [Up: 4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1705.4) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1705~en-mt.4.14) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1705.4.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1705.4.14) · Pramāṇa