[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [仁王般若經疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1707) › 1.94 # 仁王般若經疏 1.94 仁王般若經疏 1.94 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.94](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1707.1.94) 爾時大王復起作禮下，品中大段第二月光諮問護果義。就中有三問答，即為三別：初一問答明生法二空本來寂滅與佛果無二。第二問眾生不可得，云何可化？答：因緣尚寂何況眾生。第三問智空。智若是有，可辨照用；智既虛寂，云何可辨照？答：法尚體空，何況於智。初問答中，初問、後答。就問中二句：初月光請二一切菩薩下，出所請之事。初請中，大王復起作禮者，月光既為扣玄之主，將欲興問，先表虔敬也。第二所請事中，初句請護佛果、後句請護十地行。 > From "At that time the great king again arose, paid homage" downward is the second major section within the chapter, Moonlight inquiring about the meaning of protecting the fruit. Therein are three questions and answers, which make three distinctions: The first question and answer clarifies that the two emptinesses of persons and dharmas are fundamentally tranquil and extinguished, non-dual with the Buddha-fruit. The second asks: Since sentient beings are unfindable, how can they be transformed? Answer: Causes and conditions are themselves tranquil, how much more so sentient beings! The third asks about the emptiness of wisdom: If wisdom is existent, its illumination and function can be differentiated; since wisdom is empty and tranquil, how can its illumination be differentiated? Answer: Dharmas are themselves empty in substance, how much more so wisdom! Within the first question and answer, there is first the question and then the answer. Within the question are two clauses: first, Moonlight's request; second, from "all bodhisattvas" downward, setting forth the matter requested. Within the first request, "the great king again arose, paid homage": since Moonlight was the host inquiring into the profound, when about to raise a question, he first expressed devout reverence. Within the second, the matter requested: the first clause requests \[an explanation of\] protecting the Buddha-fruit, and the latter clause requests \[an explanation of\] protecting the practice of the ten stages. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.93](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1707.1.93) - [Next: 1.95](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1707.1.95) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1707.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1707~en-mt.1.94) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1707.1.94](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1707.1.94) · Pramāṇa