[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [仁王經疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1708) › 1.11 # 仁王經疏 1.11 仁王經疏 1.11 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1708.1.11) 問：護法宗，如《成唯識》不遣依他，如何此中說依他起非空非有？解云：護法正言，如《成唯識》不遣依他，而今欲成聖天論意，故立中道，而不相違。一云：護法正宗立中道義，而《成唯識》述瑜伽宗，故亦不違。 > Question: In Dharmapāla's system, as in the Vijñaptimātratāsiddhi, the other-dependent is not eliminated; why is it said here that the other-dependent is neither empty nor existent? Answer: Dharmapāla's authentic view, as in the Vijñaptimātratāsiddhi, does not eliminate the other-dependent; but now, wishing to bring to completion the intention of Āryadeva's treatise, he establishes the Middle Way, and so there is no contradiction. Another says: Dharmapāla's fundamental tenet establishes the meaning of the Middle Way, whereas the Vijñaptimātratāsiddhi recounts the Yogācāra tenet; therefore, there is also no contradiction. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1708.1.10) - [Next: 1.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1708.1.12) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1708.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1708~en-mt.1.11) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1708.1.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1708.1.11) · Pramāṇa