[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [仁王護國般若波羅蜜多經疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1709) › 1.48 # 仁王護國般若波羅蜜多經疏 1.48 仁王護國般若波羅蜜多經疏 1.48 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.48](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1709.1.48) 問：何須廢別，總說我聞？答：若不言我但云耳聞，耳通一切，是誰耳聞？又復聞時，根、境及空、作意、分別、染淨種子并根本依，一一具陳乃成繁廣。若唯說一，義用不周，所以廢別總說我聞。 > Question: Why is it necessary to set aside the specific and collectively say "have I heard"? Answer: If one did not say "I" but merely said "the ear heard", the ear applies to all, so whose ear heard? Furthermore, at the time of hearing, the faculty, object, space, attention, discrimination, defiled and pure seeds, together with the fundamental support—if each and every one were fully set forth, it would become cumbersome and broad. If one stated only one, the meaning and function would not be comprehensive; therefore, setting aside the specific, it is collectively said "have I heard". > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.47](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1709.1.47) - [Next: 1.49](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1709.1.49) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1709.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1709~en-mt.1.48) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1709.1.48](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1709.1.48) · Pramāṇa