<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1709.2.21 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [仁王護國般若波羅蜜多經疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1709) › 2.21

# 仁王護國般若波羅蜜多經疏 2.21

仁王護國般若波羅蜜多經疏 2.21

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [2.21](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1709.2.21)

問：念於別境明記為性，如何此云念生滅空？答：念名即同，所因有異。彼別境念，明記為性；此不相應時中假立，一生滅頃假立念名，念無實體悉皆空也。從此第四結諸法空。

> Question: Mindfulness (smṛti) has clear recollection as its nature among the particular mental factors; why is it said here that a thought-moment (smṛti/kṣaṇa) arises, ceases, and is empty? Answer: The word \*nian\* is the same, but that to which it refers differs. That mindfulness among the particular mental factors has clear recollection as its nature; this one is nominally designated within time among the non-associated formations: the span of a single arising and ceasing is provisionally designated with the name "thought-moment." The thought-moment has no real substance and is entirely empty. Next is the fourth \[part\], concluding on the emptiness of all phenomena.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 2.20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1709.2.20)
- [Next: 2.22](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1709.2.22)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1709.2)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1709~en-mt.2.21) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1709.2.21](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1709.2.21) · Pramāṇa
