[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [仁王護國般若波羅蜜多經疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1709) › 2.536 # 仁王護國般若波羅蜜多經疏 2.536 仁王護國般若波羅蜜多經疏 2.536 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.536](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1709.2.536) 解曰：若言無等者，此雙難也。若俗無者，智不應二，何故說有真俗二智？若言有者，智不應一，何故真智證解之時無有二也。約人辯者，凡夫迷真，智唯緣俗；二乘理事，定散別緣；地上菩薩實智唯真；五地已前根本證真後得達俗，於真俗諦二智不俱；八地已後乃至諸佛，境雖有二智容俱故。總依此義，隨應問者。若言無者，俗智不應見二；若言有者，真智不應照一。牒境難智，有斯異矣。從此第三雙結云何。 > The commentary: "If one says it does not exist" and so on is a twofold challenge. If the conventional does not exist, cognition should not be two—why then speak of having two cognitions, the real and conventional? If one says it exists, cognition should not be one—why then, at the time of realization and understanding through real cognition, is there no duality? Clarifying this in terms of persons: ordinary persons are deluded about the real, and their cognition takes only the conventional as its object; for the two vehicles, principle and phenomena are taken as objects separately in concentration and distraction; for bodhisattvas on the bhūmis, real cognition is exclusively directed to the real; prior to the fifth bhūmi, fundamental cognition realizes the real, and subsequent cognition penetrates the conventional, so the two cognitions do not occur together with respect to the ultimate and conventional truths; from the eighth bhūmi onward and up to all buddhas, although the objective realms are two, cognition can occur together. In general, based on this meaning, the question is posed accordingly: if one says it does not exist, conventional cognition should not see two; if one says it exists, real cognition should not illuminate one. Repeating the objective realm to challenge cognition, there is this distinction. From here, the third part concludes with a twofold "how is it?" > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.535](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1709.2.535) - [Next: 2.537](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1709.2.537) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1709.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1709~en-mt.2.536) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (2) - [仁王般若經疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1707.2.109) — Classical Chinese - [佛說仁王般若波羅蜜經](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.245.1.44) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1709.2.536](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1709.2.536) · Pramāṇa