[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [法華經義記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1715) › 2.28 # 法華經義記 2.28 法華經義記 2.28 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1715.2.28) 問者言：「日月燈明佛本因妙光說經，是大乘人因其正說經，今藥王等乃因其流通經，何關因其說經事？今釋迦出定，乃因舍利弗及與彌勒，此豈成同耶？」解釋者言：「當深得其意，此因非對說之因，此乃是憑附之因，因附此人得明此理，故言同也。」 > The questioner says: "The Buddha Candrasūryapradīpa originally expounded the sūtra occasioned by Varaprabha, who was a Mahāyāna person occasioned by whom the sūtra was directly expounded. Now, Bhaiṣajyarāja and the others are merely occasioned to disseminate the sūtra; how does that pertain to the matter of being the occasion for expounding the sūtra? Now when Śākya arises from samādhi, it is occasioned by Śāriputra and Maitreya; how could this constitute an identity?" The interpreter says: "One must deeply grasp its meaning. This 'occasion' is not the occasion of being addressed in the exposition; this is an occasion of reliance—relying upon this person, this principle could be illuminated. Therefore they are said to be identical." > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.27](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1715.2.27) - [Next: 2.29](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1715.2.29) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1715.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1715~en-mt.2.28) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1715.2.28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1715.2.28) · Pramāṇa