[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [法華經義記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1715) › 4.58 # 法華經義記 4.58 法華經義記 4.58 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [4.58](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1715.4.58) 問者言：「若阿羅漢猶有生死不得入涅槃者，是則無學行人皆不得入無餘涅槃，不應言羅漢心得自在。」解釋言：「從來判此有理有教，若覈實理何曾入無餘；神明不可斷滅，就教為論得入涅槃。昔教不言三界外更有生死，是故以教惑理得入涅槃，即是羅漢心得自在義也。」 > The questioner says: "If an arhat still has birth and death and cannot enter nirvāṇa, then no non-learning practitioner can enter nirvāṇa without remainder, and it should not be said that the arhat's mind attains mastery." The interpreter says: "Hitherto, this has been determined by principle and by teaching. If one examines the actual principle, when have they ever entered \[nirvāṇa\] without remainder? The spiritual consciousness cannot be annihilated; speaking with respect to the teaching, they do attain entry into nirvāṇa. The former teaching did not state that there is still birth and death outside the three realms; therefore, by doubting principle on the basis of the teaching, they attain entry into nirvāṇa—this is precisely the meaning of the arhat's mind attaining mastery." > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 4.57](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1715.4.57) - [Next: 4.59](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1715.4.59) - [Up: 4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1715.4) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1715~en-mt.4.58) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1715.4.58](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1715.4.58) · Pramāṇa