[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [妙法蓮華經玄義](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1716) › 8.125 # 妙法蓮華經玄義 8.125 妙法蓮華經玄義 8.125 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [8.125](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1716.8.125) 幻有尚不可得，況復幻空而當可得？即是兩捨為門。是通教即空之四門也。若三乘共稟而根性不同，各於四句入第一義，故此四句皆名為門。故青目注論云：「諸法實相有三種。」今是三乘人同入此門，見第一義者，是即空之一種也。 > Illusory existence cannot even be found, how much less could illusory emptiness be found? That is to say, relinquishing both constitutes the gate. These are the four gates of identity with emptiness of the shared teaching. If the three vehicles receive it in common but their capacities differ, they each enter paramārtha through one of the four propositions; hence these four propositions are all termed gates. Therefore Qingmu's commentary on the treatise states: 'There are three kinds of the true mark of all dharmas.' Now, people of the three vehicles entering this gate together and seeing paramārtha is the one kind that is identity with emptiness. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 8.124](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1716.8.124) - [Next: 8.126](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1716.8.126) - [Up: 8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1716.8) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1716~en-mt.8.125) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1716.8.125](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1716.8.125) · Pramāṇa