<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1716.8.20 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [妙法蓮華經玄義](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1716) › 8.20

# 妙法蓮華經玄義 8.20

妙法蓮華經玄義 8.20

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [8.20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1716.8.20)

若謂滅度偏，不含三德者，今作含釋，滅者即解脫，解脫必有其人，人即法身，法身不直身，必有靈智，靈智即般若。又大即法身，滅即解脫，度即般若。但標滅度，含三宛然，何得無翻耶？若執一言，則彼彼相是非，不達佛意，已如上說。

> If one says that "extinction and crossing over" is biased and does not contain the three virtues, we now explain it as containing them: extinction is liberation; liberation must have its person, and that person is the dharma-kāya; the dharma-kāya is not just a body, but must possess numinous wisdom, and numinous wisdom is prajñā. Furthermore, "great" is the dharma-kāya, "extinction" is liberation, and "crossing over" is prajñā. Merely setting forth "extinction and crossing over," it contains the three manifestly; how could it be untranslatable? If one clings to a single word, then they condemn each other and fail to fathom the Buddha's intent, as has already been stated above.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 8.19](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1716.8.19)
- [Next: 8.21](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1716.8.21)
- [Up: 8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1716.8)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1716~en-mt.8.20) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1716.8.20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1716.8.20) · Pramāṇa
