[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [法華玄義釋籤](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1717) › 10.24 # 法華玄義釋籤 10.24 法華玄義釋籤 10.24 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [10.24](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1717.10.24) 言異義同。何者？空假為因，中道為果，從假入空為因中總相，從空入假為因中別相，別人修中初但總相為果上總，若入初地雙照二諦為果上別，當知四義與三不殊。 > The words differ, but the meaning is the same. Why so? Emptiness and provisionality are the cause; the Middle Way is the fruit. Entering emptiness from provisionality is the general characteristic in the cause; entering provisionality from emptiness is the specific characteristic in the cause. When a person of the Separate cultivates the Middle, initially it is only the general characteristic, which is the general in the fruit; when entering the first bhūmi, illuminating both truths simultaneously, this is the specific in the fruit. One should know that the four meanings do not differ from the three. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 10.23](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1717.10.23) - [Next: 10.25](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1717.10.25) - [Up: 10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1717.10) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1717~en-mt.10.24) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1717.10.24](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1717.10.24) · Pramāṇa