[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [法華玄義釋籤](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1717) › 11.14 # 法華玄義釋籤 11.14 法華玄義釋籤 11.14 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [11.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1717.11.14) 前明興者，若不論廢無由得興，雖復相對意在於興；今文明廢，若不假興何以明廢，雖復相對意在於廢。 > As for explaining arising previously: without discussing abrogation, there would be no ground for arising; although they are contrasted, the intention lay in arising. Now this text explains abrogation: without relying on arising, how could abrogation be clarified? Although they are contrasted, the intention lies in abrogation. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 11.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1717.11.13) - [Next: 11.15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1717.11.15) - [Up: 11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1717.11) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1717~en-mt.11.14) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1717.11.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1717.11.14) · Pramāṇa