[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [法華玄義釋籤](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1717) › 6.45 # 法華玄義釋籤 6.45 法華玄義釋籤 6.45 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [6.45](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1717.6.45) 三問答釋疑中，先問境意，既開權顯實唯應一實，何故紛葩六相不同？復相間入情智出沒。次答中二：先總明諸紛葩之意，次正約味明紛葩之相。於中又二：先法、次譬。初文又二：先釋、次結。初者，此並如來無謀之巧，致使說境離合殊途，鑒理之智奚嘗增減？然同體妙用不動而運，故能逗物施設參差，照彼妙機，理藏平等，不謀而感致益不空，故獲諸味。若橫若竪、若顯若密，雖種熟脫異，入祕藏不殊。次結，可知，譬中先譬、次況。 > In the third part, questions and answers resolving doubts: first, questioning the intent of the objects. Since the provisional has been opened to reveal the real, there should only be the one real truth; why are there diverse six aspects that are not identical, mutually intermingling, and appearing and disappearing according to sentiment and wisdom? Next, in the answer, there are two parts: first, generally explaining the intent of these diverse aspects; second, directly explaining the aspects of the diverse forms according to the flavors. Here, too, there are two parts: first, the doctrinal principle; second, the metaphor. The first text also has two parts: first, the explanation; second, the conclusion. In the first: these are all the effortless skillfulness of the Tathāgata, causing the taught objects to have different paths of separation and combination, yet how could the wisdom that scrutinizes the principle ever increase or decrease? However, the wondrous functioning of the identical essence operates without moving, and can thus adapt to beings with diverse provisions; illuminating those wondrous capacities, the treasury of principle is equal, and being stimulated without contrivance, it brings about benefits that are not in vain, thereby obtaining the various flavors. Whether horizontal or vertical, whether manifest or secret, though planting, ripening, and liberating differ, entering the secret treasury is not different. The conclusion can be known. In the metaphor, the metaphor comes first, followed by the comparative inference. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 6.44](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1717.6.44) - [Next: 6.46](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1717.6.46) - [Up: 6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1717.6) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1717~en-mt.6.45) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1717.6.45](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1717.6.45) · Pramāṇa