<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1719.1.33 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [法華文句記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1719) › 1.33

# 法華文句記 1.33

法華文句記 1.33

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [1.33](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1719.1.33)

有師四段，但合二三為正，甚符經文；但闕立本迹二門，各有三段意耳。其名既闕，義恐不周。光宅二十四段者，具在彼疏云云者，象氣之分散，如雲在天非可卒量也。意言下未說者尚多如雲，下去皆爾。已下有列光宅分文者，多分與今大同小異。

> The master with four sections merely joined the second and third to make the main body of the sūtra, which accords closely with the sūtra text; he only lacked the intention to establish the two gates of origin and traces, each having three sections. Since the designations were missing, the meaning was likely incomplete. As for Guangzhai’s twenty-four sections: they are fully found in his commentary. The expression “and so forth” (yunyun) resembles the dispersing of vapor, like clouds in the sky that cannot be swiftly measured. The intention is to say that what has not yet been spoken below remains as manifold as clouds; the same applies below. Where Guangzhai’s divisions of the text are listed below, for the most part they are largely the same with minor differences compared to our school.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 1.32](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1719.1.32)
- [Next: 1.34](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1719.1.34)
- [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1719.1)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1719~en-mt.1.33) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1719.1.33](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1719.1.33) · Pramāṇa
