<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.1.20 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [法華玄論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720) › 1.20

# 法華玄論 1.20

法華玄論 1.20

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [1.20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.1.20)

答：斷閻浮提人命者，即有二義：一者但殺肉身、二者所害猶少。若有所得說法者，一害諸佛法身、二遍毀正教。所以然者，生死肉身以愛著為本，諸佛法身從無住而生，是故殺生過輕而說有所得罪重也。

> Answer: Severing the life of people in Jambudvīpa has two aspects: first, it merely kills the physical body; second, those harmed are still few. If one preaches the Dharma with grasping: first, it harms the dharmakāya of all Buddhas; second, it universally destroys the correct teaching. Why is this so? The physical body of saṃsāra takes craving and attachment as its root, while the dharmakāya of all Buddhas arises from non-abiding. Therefore, the fault of killing living beings is light, whereas the sin of preaching with grasping is heavy.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 1.19](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.1.19)
- [Next: 1.21](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.1.21)
- [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.1)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720~en-mt.1.20) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.1.20](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.1.20) · Pramāṇa
