<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.2.55 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [法華玄論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720) › 2.55

# 法華玄論 2.55

法華玄論 2.55

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [2.55](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.2.55)

問：若爾，三周具明形、教、壽量，何繁說耶？

> Question: If so, and the three cycles fully explain physical form, teachings, and lifespan, why is there such redundant exposition?  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 2.54](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.2.54)
- [Next: 2.56](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.2.56)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.2)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720~en-mt.2.55) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.2.55](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.2.55) · Pramāṇa
