[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [法華玄論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720) › 3.24 # 法華玄論 3.24 法華玄論 3.24 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [3.24](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.3.24) 答：若得少分便說《波若》是三乘通教者，《大經》云「如人得食亦名涅槃」，二乘斷三界惑，豈不得涅槃少分耶？故不應以少分之言證三乘通教。又《小波若》云「此經為大乘者說、為最上乘者說。」故知《波若不》通教三乘。 > Answer: If attaining a small part were to justify saying that Prajñā is a teaching shared by the three vehicles, then the Mahāparinirvāṇa-sūtra states, 'Just as when a person obtains food it is also called nirvāṇa'; when the two vehicles sever the afflictions of the three realms, do they not attain a small part of nirvāṇa? Therefore, one should not use the statement about a small part to prove a teaching shared by the three vehicles. Furthermore, the Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā-prajñāpāramitā states: 'This sūtra is spoken for those of the Great Vehicle, spoken for those of the Supreme Vehicle.' Hence we know that Prajñā is not a teaching shared by the three vehicles. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 3.23](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.3.23) - [Next: 3.25](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.3.25) - [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.3) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720~en-mt.3.24) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.3.24](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.3.24) · Pramāṇa