[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [法華玄論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720) › 3.73 # 法華玄論 3.73 法華玄論 3.73 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [3.73](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.3.73) 問：二種破義有異，不應言同。《淨名》破其有所得義，《法華》破其執五乘異義，何得言同？ > Question: The meanings of the two kinds of refutation are different, so they should not be called the same. Vimalakīrti refutes their notion of attainment, whereas the Saddharmapuṇḍarīka-sūtra refutes their attachment to the distinct meanings of the five vehicles; how can they be called the same? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 3.72](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.3.72) - [Next: 3.74](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.3.74) - [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.3) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720~en-mt.3.73) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.3.73](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.3.73) · Pramāṇa