<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.3.74 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [法華玄論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720) › 3.74

# 法華玄論 3.74

法華玄論 3.74

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [3.74](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.3.74)

答：此義即兩經有異，但法華破執，破執必是有所得，今取同是有所得是故被破，所以言同也。

> Answer: In this sense the two sūtras indeed differ, but the Saddharmapuṇḍarīka refutes attachments, and refuting attachment necessarily concerns having notions of attainment; here, taking them as sharing in having notions of attainment and thus being refuted, they are therefore said to be the same.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 3.73](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.3.73)
- [Next: 3.75](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.3.75)
- [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.3)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720~en-mt.3.74) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.3.74](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.3.74) · Pramāṇa
