<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.5.9 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [法華玄論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720) › 5.9

# 法華玄論 5.9

法華玄論 5.9

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [5.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.5.9)

答：此乃廢三實、立三是方便耳。前明廢除三方便，是故異也。又開義在前、廢義在後，要先開三是方便，然後始得廢之。不爾，無因緣故不得廢也。

> Answer: This is merely abolishing the reality of the three and establishing that the three are skillful means. It differs from the previous \[explanation\] that spoke of abolishing and removing the three skillful means. Moreover, the meaning of 'opening' comes first, while the meaning of 'abolishing' comes after: one must first open up that the three are skillful means, and only then can one proceed to abolish them. Otherwise, lacking causes and conditions, they cannot be abolished.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 5.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.5.8)
- [Next: 5.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.5.10)
- [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.5)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720~en-mt.5.9) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.5.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.5.9) · Pramāṇa
