<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.9.102 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [法華玄論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720) › 9.102

# 法華玄論 9.102

法華玄論 9.102

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [9.102](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.9.102)

答：二佛有一義、有異義。一義者，如《華嚴．名號》說，或名釋迦或名舍那。兩佛異義者，如《梵網》本迹不同。又《華嚴》中二乘但見釋迦，不見舍那。又如《像法決疑》明二佛為異也。

> Answer: The two Buddhas have an aspect of identity and an aspect of difference. The aspect of identity is as stated in the "Names" \[chapter\] of the Avataṃsaka: he is named Śākya, or named Rocana. The aspect of difference between the two Buddhas is like the distinction between the original and the trace in the Fanwang \[jing\]. Furthermore, in the Avataṃsaka, those of the two vehicles saw only Śākyamuni and did not see Rocana. Again, it is as the Xiangfa jueyi explains the difference between the two Buddhas.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 9.101](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.9.101)
- [Next: 9.103](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.9.103)
- [Up: 9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.9)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720~en-mt.9.102) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.9.102](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1720.9.102) · Pramāṇa
