[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [法華義疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721) › 1.248 # 法華義疏 1.248 法華義疏 1.248 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.248](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.1.248) 《未曾有經》、《須太拏經》及《瑞應經》皆云「羅睺羅是瞿夷之子」，至如《法華》所辨，是耶輸之兒。經云「耶輸是第二夫人，瞿夷是第一夫人」，故《十二遊經》云「太子有三夫人，第一名瞿夷；第二名耶維，耶維即耶輸陀羅也；第三名鹿野。三夫人各領二萬采女，故太子有六萬采女。」何故二說不同？ > The \*Weicengyou jing\*, the \*Xudana jing\*, and the \*Ruiying jing\* all say that "Rāhula is the son of Gopī", whereas according to what is explained in the \*Lotus Sūtra\*, he is the son of Yaśodharā. The sūtra says: "Yaśodharā was the second consort, and Gopī was the first consort." Thus the \*Shier you jing\* says: "The Crown Prince had three consorts: the first was named Gopī; the second was named Yewei—Yewei is Yaśodharā; the third was named Luye (Mṛgadāvā). Each of the three consorts commanded twenty thousand court ladies; hence the Crown Prince had sixty thousand court ladies." Why do the two explanations differ? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.247](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.1.247) - [Next: 1.249](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.1.249) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721~en-mt.1.248) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.1.248](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.1.248) · Pramāṇa