<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.11.98 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [法華義疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721) › 11.98

# 法華義疏 11.98

法華義疏 11.98

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [11.98](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.11.98)

有人言：論云無者無有麁香；今言有者，有細香也。有人言：此是著體物故有香，金銀之質則無香也。例如風本無色，〈觀音品〉云「假使黑風，隨所吹處」，故得此名，今亦爾也。今謂同上破毘曇義，小乘根鈍不知其天香，大士則知也。

> Some say: When the treatise says they lack it, it means they lack coarse fragrances; now when it says they have it, they have subtle fragrances. Some say: This is because things adhere to their substance, therefore there is fragrance; the nature of gold and silver itself lacks fragrance. For example, wind fundamentally has no color, but the 'Avalokiteśvara Chapter' says, 'Supposing a black gale blows wherever it goes', thus acquiring this name; here it is also like this. Now I say that it is identical to the above refutation of the Abhidharma doctrine: practitioners of the Hīnayāna have dull faculties and do not know their heavenly fragrances, whereas great beings know them.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 11.97](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.11.97)
- [Next: 11.99](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.11.99)
- [Up: 11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.11)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721~en-mt.11.98) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.11.98](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.11.98) · Pramāṇa
