[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [法華義疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721) › 2.103 # 法華義疏 2.103 法華義疏 2.103 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.103](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.2.103) 雨華、動地、放光何故不合為一類，而前明兩瑞後明覩瑞，今復現光，瑞後明覩瑞耶？ > Why are the raining of flowers, the shaking of the earth, and the emitting of light not combined into a single category, but instead the first two omens are explained followed by beholding the omens, and then the light is manifested, with beholding the omen explained after that? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.102](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.2.102) - [Next: 2.104](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.2.104) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721~en-mt.2.103) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.2.103](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.2.103) · Pramāṇa