<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.3.167 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [法華義疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721) › 3.167

# 法華義疏 3.167

法華義疏 3.167

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [3.167](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.3.167)

前句云唯佛與佛乃能究盡諸法實相，今稱所謂相性，還是釋前實相，云何言前是無差別、後是差別耶？

> The preceding sentence says that only a buddha together with a buddha can exhaustively fathom the true mark of all phenomena. Now stating the so-called marks and natures is still explaining the preceding true mark; why do you say that the former is non-differentiation and the latter is differentiation?  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 3.166](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.3.166)
- [Next: 3.168](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.3.168)
- [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.3)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721~en-mt.3.167) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.3.167](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.3.167) · Pramāṇa
