[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [法華義疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721) › 8.68 # 法華義疏 8.68 法華義疏 8.68 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [8.68](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.8.68) 通是一道清淨，隨義立名，或稱種智、或名涅槃、或名一乘、或名波若，故前明終歸種智，今云終歸涅槃。若以二文共相會者，前明終歸種智，謂三菩提果也；今云終歸涅槃，謂果果也。良由二乘智非究竟智，故終歸佛智，二乘涅槃非究竟，故終歸大涅槃也。上合大車亦取此二義合之，如前釋也。 > In general, it is the purity of the single path; designations are established in accordance with different senses: sometimes it is called all-knowledge, sometimes nirvāṇa, sometimes the ekayāna, sometimes prajñā. Therefore, above it explained “ultimately returning to all-knowledge,” while here it says “ultimately returning to nirvāṇa.” If we reconcile the two passages: the former clarifying “ultimately returning to all-knowledge” refers to the fruit of saṃbodhi; the present saying “ultimately returning to nirvāṇa” refers to the fruit of the fruit. This is truly because the wisdom of the two vehicles is not the ultimate wisdom, hence they ultimately return to the Buddha’s wisdom; and the nirvāṇa of the two vehicles is not ultimate, hence they ultimately return to the great nirvāṇa. The matching of the great carriage above also adopted these two meanings to match it, as explained previously. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 8.67](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.8.67) - [Next: 8.69](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.8.69) - [Up: 8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.8) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721~en-mt.8.68) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.8.68](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1721.8.68) · Pramāṇa