[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [金剛三昧經論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1730) › 2.13 # 金剛三昧經論 2.13 金剛三昧經論 2.13 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1730.2.13) 論曰：是第四拒。於中有二：不者，直拒；何以故下，第二釋拒。拒意而言：若彼意謂無得無忍，則雖不得有得有忍之有，而猶得其無得無忍之無。既得於無者，則心住於無。心既有住，即是有生。謂有心生於有所得故，亦違於無生無得，是故說言並為虛妄。 > The commentary states: This is the fourth \[division\], the refutation. Therein are two parts: 'No' is the direct refutation; from 'Why is that?' onward is the second, explaining the refutation. The intent of the refutation is: If their thought supposes no attainment and no tolerance, then although they do not attain the existence of having attainment and having tolerance, they still attain the non-existence of having no attainment and no tolerance. Since they attain non-existence, their mind abides in non-existence. When the mind has an abiding, this is precisely having arising. Supposing that there is a mind arising in that which is attained also contradicts non-arising and non-attainment; therefore it is said that both are false and delusive. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1730.2.12) - [Next: 2.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1730.2.14) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1730.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1730~en-mt.2.13) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1730.2.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1730.2.13) · Pramāṇa