<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1730.2.23 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [金剛三昧經論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1730) › 2.23

# 金剛三昧經論 2.23

金剛三昧經論 2.23

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [2.23](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1730.2.23)

論曰：此是第三舉非。謂有說言無生忍心，心體可得住於無生，及與能見無生理者，不了心性。直是妄執，能障菩提及其般若，是明不得性淨菩提、能證般若。又菩提者，始起菩提。言般若者，菩提之因。不得覺因故為長夜，無始妄想是大夢故。

> The commentary states: This is the third \[part\], presenting the incorrect. Supposing someone says regarding the mind of tolerance of non-arising that the essence of the mind can be attained, abides in non-arising, and can see the principle of non-arising, they do not understand the nature of the mind. This is simply delusive grasping, which obstructs bodhi and prajñā; this clarifies failing to attain the intrinsically pure bodhi and the prajñā that realizes it. Furthermore, 'bodhi' refers to newly arisen bodhi; 'prajñā' refers to the cause of bodhi. Failing to attain the cause of awakening, it is therefore the long night, because beginningless delusive conceptualization is a great dream.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 2.22](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1730.2.22)
- [Next: 2.24](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1730.2.24)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1730.2)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1730~en-mt.2.23) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1730.2.23](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1730.2.23) · Pramāṇa
