[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [金剛三昧經論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1730) › 2.9 # 金剛三昧經論 2.9 金剛三昧經論 2.9 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1730.2.9) 論曰：是第二答。答意有二：先示無生忍相、後顯有得過失。無生法忍者，達法本無生，是則定慧諸行亦無有生，非於無生有能忍行，故言非無生行。於中有得能忍之行，則乖真忍無住無行，故言即為虛妄。 > The commentary states: This is the second \[division\], the answer. The intent of the answer has two parts: first, indicating the characteristics of the tolerance of non-arising, and later, revealing the error of possessing attainment. 'Tolerance of the non-arising of dharmas' means realizing that dharmas are originally unarisen; this being so, all practices of concentration and wisdom are likewise without arising, not that there is an active practice of tolerance toward non-arising—hence it says 'yet not a practice of non-arising'. If within this there is an attainment of an active practice of tolerance, it would contradict true tolerance being without abiding and without practice; hence it says 'is itself false and delusive'. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1730.2.8) - [Next: 2.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1730.2.10) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1730.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1730~en-mt.2.9) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1730.2.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1730.2.9) · Pramāṇa