<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1735.50.11 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1735) › 50.11

# 大方廣佛華嚴經疏 50.11

大方廣佛華嚴經疏 50.11

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [50.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1735.50.11)

第四「佛子如來應正等」下三輪平等，釋上於法平等，等諸法故、意輪等故，何所疑哉？文中二：先別舉身等、後類結顯多。今初，有十三身，前六等事、次三等理、次一等事理事事無礙、後三等因果。略舉十三，故結云無量。皆言量者，是所等之分量。皆言等者，即能等之三輪。等有二義：一者等彼事理之量、二者等彼事理之體。所以等者，彼諸理事即我所證，能所冥合，彼尚即我，等之何難。是以聖人空洞無像，物無非我，會萬物以成己也。後「佛子如所得」下類結可知。

> Fourth, from 'O sons of the Buddha, the Tathāgata, Arhat, Samyaksaṃbuddha' downward: the equality of the three wheels, explaining the earlier 'equal regarding dharmas,' because of being equal to all dharmas, and because the mind-wheel is equal, what could there be to doubt? The text has two parts: first, specifically raising the bodies and so forth; second, generalizing and concluding to reveal multiplicity. In the first, there are thirteen bodies: the first six are equal to phenomena; the next three are equal to noumenon; the next one is equal to the non-obstruction between noumenon and phenomena and the non-obstruction among phenomena; the last three are equal to cause and fruit. Briefly raising thirteen, it concludes by saying 'boundless.' Where all say 'measure,' it is the measure of what is equalled. Where all say 'equal,' it is the three wheels that do the equalling. Equality has two meanings: first, equalling the measure of those phenomena and noumenon; second, equalling the essence of those phenomena and noumenon. Why are they equal? Those phenomena and noumenon are what I have realized; subject and object merge, and they are already me, so how could equalling them be difficult? Therefore, the sage is empty and without image, and nothing among things is not myself; uniting the myriad things to complete oneself. Second, from 'O sons of the Buddha, like what is attained' downward: generalizing and concluding, which can be understood.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 50.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1735.50.10)
- [Next: 50.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1735.50.12)
- [Up: 50](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1735.50)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1735~en-mt.50.11) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1735.50.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1735.50.11) · Pramāṇa
