<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.11.54 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 11.54

# 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 11.54

大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 11.54

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [11.54](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.11.54)

疏「多望於一」下，二生後正例。全同前門，但改一為多、改多為一耳。若結，應云：攝他一同多己、廢多己同一他耳。前一望於多，攝之與廢皆是一也。此中多望於一，攝廢皆是多。則二義懸隔矣。餘如相入門，思之。

> On the Commentary's passage starting from "Looking from the many toward the one": second, generating what follows to draw the direct analogy. It is completely identical with the preceding gate, only changing "one" to "many" and "many" to "one." If concluding, one should say: "assimilating the other one into one's own many, and relinquishing one's own many to be identical with the other one." Previously, looking from the one toward the many, assimilation and relinquishment both belonged to the one. Here, looking from the many toward the one, assimilation and relinquishment both belong to the many. Thus the two meanings are wide apart. For the rest, as in the gate of mutual entrance, contemplate it.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 11.53](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.11.53)
- [Next: 11.55](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.11.55)
- [Up: 11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.11)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.11.54) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.11.54](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.11.54) · Pramāṇa
