[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 18.10 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 18.10 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 18.10 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [18.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.18.10) 疏「染違性淨」等者，即通外難。謂有問言：涅槃既無不包，染淨同在其內，何以果用即言出生，居處屋宅不言出生？故今釋云：染淨之法涅槃實包，淨則順體，染則違體。證會涅槃方有大用，故曰出生。染既違淨，非此出矣。而體不離，故云依現耳。 > Regarding the Commentary's "Defilement opposes nature-purity" and so forth: this resolves an outside objection. That is, someone asks: Since nirvāṇa contains nothing that it does not embrace, and defilement and purity are both within it, why is it that fruition and function are said to be 'produced', whereas dwellings and houses are not said to be 'produced'? Therefore it is now explained: dharmas of defilement and purity are indeed embraced by nirvāṇa; purity conforms to the essence, while defilement opposes the essence. Only when one realizes and merges with nirvāṇa is there great function; hence it is called 'production'. Since defilement opposes purity, it does not arise from this. Yet its essence is not separate \[from nirvāṇa\]; hence it is said to 'manifest in dependence on it'. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 18.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.18.9) - [Next: 18.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.18.11) - [Up: 18](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.18) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.18.10) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.18.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.18.10) · Pramāṇa