[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 24.39 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 24.39 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 24.39 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [24.39](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.24.39) 疏「無生為佛法體故」者，諸經論中皆詮無生之理，故《淨名》不二發始明之，《楞伽經》說一切不生，《中論》不生為論宗體。傅大士亦云：「佛法以無生為體、無著為宗。忘想為因、涅槃為果。」諸文非一。 > Regarding the commentary's statement, "Because unarisenness is the essence of the Buddha's teaching": all sūtras and treatises explain the principle of unarisenness. Therefore, the \*Vimalakīrti-nirdeśa\* explains it from the very beginning of the Non-duality \[chapter\], the \*Laṅkāvatāra-sūtra\* states that all things are unarisen, and the \*Madhyamakaśāstra\* takes unarisenness as the central doctrine and essence of the treatise. Mahāsattva Fu also said: "The Buddha-Dharma takes unarisenness as its essence and non-attachment as its central doctrine; forgetting thoughts is the cause, and nirvāṇa is the fruit." The texts \[stating this\] are not one. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 24.38](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.24.38) - [Next: 24.40](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.24.40) - [Up: 24](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.24) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.24.39) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.24.39](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.24.39) · Pramāṇa