[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 24.9 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 24.9 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 24.9 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [24.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.24.9) 疏「身等不唯分故」等者，謂由上諸義，理性不唯無分，故在一切處而全體在於一內；不唯分故，常在一中而全在一切處。而事法不唯分故，常在此處恒在他方；不唯無分，故遍一切處而不移本位。又由理性不唯無分故，不在一事外；不唯分故，不在一事內。事法不唯分故，常在此處而無在；不唯無分故，常在他處而無不在。是故無在無不在，而在此在彼無有障礙也。然此中有兩對事理，各有二四句，乃成八句。疏中但出二句，謂上云證理不唯無分故，即初對約理一句。其一切法皆爾者，舉例耳。今云身等不唯分者，即是後對中約事一句，以身等即事也。餘之六句略而不出。故上總言各二四句，意中含取。 > Regarding the commentary's statement “The body and so forth are not merely partitioned”, and so forth: this means that owing to the meanings above, the nature of principle is not merely unpartitioned, so while being in all places its entire essence resides within one; and it is not merely partitioned, so while constantly being within one it is entirely in all places. Phenomenal dharmas are not merely partitioned, so while constantly being in this place they are perpetually in other directions; and they are not merely unpartitioned, so they pervade all places without moving from their original position. Furthermore, because the nature of principle is not merely unpartitioned, it is not outside a single phenomenon; because it is not merely partitioned, it is not inside a single phenomenon. Phenomenal dharmas are not merely partitioned, so they are constantly here yet nowhere; because they are not merely unpartitioned, they are constantly elsewhere yet nowhere absent. Therefore, being nowhere and nowhere absent, their presence here and presence there are free from obstruction. Here there are two pairs of principle and phenomena, each with two sets of four propositions, forming eight propositions in all. The commentary only sets forth two propositions: stating above that realizing principle is not merely unpartitioned is the single proposition regarding principle from the first pair. The remark that all dharmas are likewise merely gives an example. When it now states that the body and so forth are not merely partitioned, this is the single proposition regarding phenomena from the latter pair, since the body and so forth are phenomena. The remaining six propositions are omitted and not brought out. Hence, above it spoke generally of each having two sets of four propositions, their meaning being implicitly encompassed. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 24.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.24.8) - [Next: 24.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.24.10) - [Up: 24](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.24) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.24.9) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.24.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.24.9) · Pramāṇa