[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 29.51 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 29.51 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 29.51 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [29.51](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.29.51) 疏「我即法性更不證入」下，釋上平等即無能所，故曰無住。然有二意：一上二句明一性不分故無能所，猶如一指不能自觸。二「法性無性復何所入」者，明性空故無能所入，亦如虛空不住虛空。此亦《大般若．曼殊室利分》意。彼經云「佛告文殊：『汝於佛法豈不趣求？』文殊言：『世尊！我今不見有法非佛法者，何所趣求？』」釋曰：此即一性意也。次佛問云：「汝於佛法已成就耶？」文殊答言：「我都不見法可名佛法，何所成就？」釋曰：即性空意也。次佛又言：「汝豈不得無著性耶？」文殊答云：「我即無著，豈無著性復得無著？」釋曰：即今疏云「我即法性，更不證入。」 > The commentary from "I am myself the dharmatā, so what further is there to realize or enter?" downward explains the equality stated above as being free of subject and object, and hence called non-abiding. However, there are two meanings: First, the two lines above clarify that because the single nature is undivided, there is no subject or object, just as a single finger cannot touch itself. Second, as for "the dharmatā lacks nature, so what further is there to enter?": this clarifies that because nature is empty, there is no subject or object of entry, just as empty space does not abide in empty space. This is also the meaning of the "Mañjuśrī Section" of the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-sūtra. That sūtra says: "The Buddha addressed Mañjuśrī: 'Do you not seek after the Buddha Dharma?' Mañjuśrī said: 'World-Honoured One! I currently do not see any dharma that is not the Buddha Dharma; what would I seek after?'" Explanation: This is the meaning of the single nature. Next, the Buddha asked: "Have you already accomplished the Buddha Dharma?" Mañjuśrī replied: "I do not see any dharma at all that can be named the Buddha Dharma; what would I accomplish?" Explanation: This is the meaning of the emptiness of nature. Next, the Buddha again said: "Do you not attain the unattached nature?" Mañjuśrī replied: "I am myself unattached; could the unattached nature again attain non-attachment?" Explanation: This is just what the present commentary calls "I am myself the dharmatā, so what further is there to realize or enter?" > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 29.50](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.29.50) - [Next: 29.52](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.29.52) - [Up: 29](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.29) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.29.51) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.29.51](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.29.51) · Pramāṇa