[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 33.15 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 33.15 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 33.15 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [33.15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.33.15) 疏「此觀亦寂故不起心」者，此釋不起心分別。然此句有二意：一既物我皆虛，故不分別物我之異。此意即淺，故略不出。今明知空之心，即是此觀二我既寂。觀何由生？若觀不忘，非見空矣。則空病亦空，能所雙寂矣。 > Regarding the commentary's "this contemplation is also quiescent, hence no mind is raised": this explains not raising the mind to discriminate. However, this line has two meanings: 1. Since both objects and the self are empty, one does not discriminate the difference between objects and the self. This meaning is shallow, so it is not set forth in detail. Now it clarifies that the mind knowing emptiness is itself this contemplation; once both kinds of self are quiescent, from what could contemplation arise? If contemplation is not forgotten, it is not seeing emptiness. Then the sickness of emptiness is also empty, and subject and object are both quiescent. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 33.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.33.14) - [Next: 33.16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.33.16) - [Up: 33](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.33) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.33.15) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.33.15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.33.15) · Pramāṇa