[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 33.17 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 33.17 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 33.17 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [33.17](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.33.17) 疏「念處有二」下，釋第二此中誰是我句。謂有問言：準念處觀，觀身不淨、觀受是苦、觀心無常、觀法無我，今何觀身為無我耶？故今答云：有通有別。上以別難，今約通說，故於觀身得作無我及苦無常不淨之觀，今但舉無我耳。 > Regarding the commentary's "The applications of mindfulness are of two kinds" and so forth: this explains the second line, "Who is the self in this?" That is to say, there is a question asking: according to the contemplation of the applications of mindfulness, one contemplates the body as impure, contemplates feeling as suffering, contemplates the mind as impermanent, and contemplates dharmas as non-self; why now contemplate the body as non-self? Therefore it now answers, saying: there are general and specific \[modes\]. The objection above was made according to the specific; now it speaks in terms of the general. Therefore, in contemplating the body, one can cultivate the contemplations of non-self, suffering, impermanence, and impurity; here it merely mentions non-self. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 33.16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.33.16) - [Next: 33.18](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.33.18) - [Up: 33](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.33) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.33.17) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.33.17](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.33.17) · Pramāṇa