[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 35.58 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 35.58 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 35.58 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [35.58](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.35.58) 疏「答即上所引大集」下，第二答，中有三：初指前引答、二別引文答、三況出圓融。今初。謂上引《大集》，灌頂即第十住，故云「彼說住終」，則初賢已得八相，何得偏引《仁王》三賢無文。 > On the commentary's "Answer: As cited above from the Mahāsaṃnipāta...": Second is the answer, which has three parts: first, pointing to the prior citation to answer; second, citing separate texts to answer; third, comparing this with the supreme perfect interfusion. Now, the first: What was cited above from the Mahāsaṃnipāta states that 'abhiseka' is the tenth abode; hence it says "that \[sūtra\] speaks of the culmination of the abodes." Thus, in the initial virtuous \[stage\], one has already attained the eight aspects. Why then cite only the Benevolent Kings \[Sūtra\], where the three virtuous \[stages\] lack such a passage? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 35.57](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.35.57) - [Next: 35.59](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.35.59) - [Up: 35](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.35) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.35.58) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.35.58](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.35.58) · Pramāṇa