[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 36.41 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 36.41 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 36.41 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [36.41](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.36.41) 疏「有云此佛神通同體」等者，三別序第五師，即《刊定記》主。亦先序昔、後辨順違。前中，以體遍為不動，以用應而猶升。疏「若爾何殊第三師不起是法」者，即第二辨違也。此有二破：一指同前義破。前義不立，此義自破。二「又以住釋於不起」下，直就所立破。唯住覺樹，非有體遍。遍於去處，何得去非體遍？然覺樹亦用，獨言是體；升天有體，但言是用，故有所違。非責本立同體業用，故下正義亦是即體業用。 > Regarding the commentary's passage, "Some say that this Buddha's spiritual penetrations are of the same essence..." and so forth: this is the third, separately recounting the fifth master, namely the author of the Kanding ji. It also first recounts the past \[view\] and afterward discerns concordance and contradiction. In the former, it takes the pervasiveness of the essence as unmoving, and the responsive manifestation of function as still ascending. Regarding the commentary's passage, "If so, how does it differ from the third master's 'not rising is the Dharma'...", this is the second, discerning contradictions. Here there are two refutations: first, refuting by pointing out its identity with the previous view. Since the previous view cannot be established, this view collapses on its own. Second, from "Furthermore, glossing 'not rising' by 'abiding'..." onward, it directly refutes it on the basis of what it established. If it merely abides at the tree of awakening, there is no pervasive essence. If it pervades the destination, how could going not be the pervasiveness of the essence? Yet the tree of awakening is also function, but he calls it exclusively essence; ascending to heaven has essence, but he calls it merely function. Therefore, there is a contradiction. It is not censuring the original establishment of operation and function of the same essence, for the correct position below is also operation and function that are identical to essence. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 36.40](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.36.40) - [Next: 36.42](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.36.42) - [Up: 36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.36) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.36.41) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.36.41](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.36.41) · Pramāṇa