<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.47.16 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 47.16

# 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 47.16

大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 47.16

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [47.16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.47.16)

疏「初三明有作淨法力」等者，此亦取論勢，而句多少所用不同。彼十句中，初總、餘別。別中，初句他力、下八自力。自力之中二：初一句有作善法淨，經云「普淨法界故」。次一句教化眾生淨，經云「普攝眾生故」。餘有六句皆名身淨，攝為三種盡等。今則有作有三句、無作有二、身淨有三，又闕教化眾生者，以依次無故，攝在初有作淨中。而言四淨者，以因中有四義故，一有力能作、二無力不能、三具二能引生、四泯攝前三。稱理成德，如次配前四淨。餘廣如彼，以句開合不同，亦可類取耳。

> Regarding the Commentary's "The first three clarify the power of the pure dharmas of active performance," and so forth: this also adopts the momentum of the treatise, yet the number of phrases used is different. Among those ten phrases, the first is general and the rest are specific. Within the specific ones, the first phrase is the power of others, and the lower eight are one's own power. Within one's own power, there are two parts: the first single phrase is the purity of active good dharmas, as the sūtra says, "Because of universally purifying the dharmadhātu." The next single phrase is the purity of teaching and transforming sentient beings, as the sūtra says, "Because of universally gathering sentient beings." The remaining six phrases are all called bodily purity, which are subsumed into the three kinds of exhaustion, and so forth. In the present \[text\], active performance has three phrases, non-active performance has two, and bodily purity has three; furthermore, teaching and transforming sentient beings is omitted, because according to this sequence it is absent, being subsumed within the initial purity of active performance. As for speaking of four purities: because within the cause there are four meanings: 1. having the power and ability to act; 2. lacking the power and unable to act; 3. possessing both and able to lead to arising; and 4. obliterating and subsuming the previous three. Conforming to principle to accomplish virtue, they are correlated in order to the previous four purities. The rest is extensive as in that \[treatise\]; because the expansion and contraction of phrases differ, one can also take them as analogous.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 47.15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.47.15)
- [Next: 47.17](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.47.17)
- [Up: 47](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.47)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.47.16) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.47.16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.47.16) · Pramāṇa
