[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 5.29 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 5.29 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 5.29 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [5.29](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.5.29) 疏「總上五義不出貫攝」，於中二：先總釋貫攝、後彰所貫攝。前中有三：初標義、二引證、三釋所引。疏「故佛地論第一」者，二引證也。全引論文，更無所少。而次下對所詮云「應知此中宣說佛地，饒益有情。依所詮義，名佛地經。如緣起經、如集寶論。」意云：皆從所詮也。 > Regarding the commentary's phrase “Summing up the above five meanings, they do not go beyond threading and holding”: within this are two points: first, generally explaining threading and holding; second, showing that which is threaded and held. In the first are three points: first, indicating the meaning; second, citing proof; third, explaining what was cited. Regarding the commentary's words “Hence the Buddhabhūmi-vyākhyāna, fascicle one,” this is the second, citing proof. It fully cites the text of the treatise without missing anything. And immediately below, with respect to what is explained, it says: “It should be known that here it expounds the Buddha-ground to benefit sentient beings. In reliance on the meaning explained, it is called the Buddhabhūmi-sūtra, like the Pratītyasamutpāda-sūtra or the Ratnarāśi-śāstra.” The meaning is: all take their names from what is explained. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 5.28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.5.28) - [Next: 5.30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.5.30) - [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.5) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.5.29) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.5.29](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.5.29) · Pramāṇa