[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736) › 55.36 # 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 55.36 大方廣佛華嚴經隨疏演義鈔 55.36 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [55.36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.55.36) 疏「二正顯所作」等者，疏文有三：初列名、二「論不指」下出體、三「故以身對業」下料揀。於中二：先成四句、後「以身約有體」下出四差別所以。以業約有用，如日身但能皎住故。言「非正所為」者，本意不為令相見故，故無業無體。今經略無。 > Regarding the Commentary's statement: 'Second, properly revealing what is done,' and so forth, the text of the Commentary has three parts: first, listing the names; second, from 'The treatise does not indicate...' downwards, presenting the essence; third, from 'Therefore, contrasting body with activity...' downwards, discriminating \[them\]. Within this there are two parts: first, establishing the four propositions; second, from 'Regarding the body pertaining to having essence...' downwards, presenting the reason for the four distinctions. This is because activity pertains to having function, just as the sun-like body can only abide brilliantly. Regarding the words 'it is not the primary purpose,' the original intent was not to cause them to see one another; thus there is neither activity nor essence. The present sūtra omits it. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 55.35](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.55.35) - [Next: 55.37](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.55.37) - [Up: 55](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.55) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736~en-mt.55.36) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.55.36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1736.55.36) · Pramāṇa